Advertise Contact About This Web Site Donate To oreilly-sucks.com
Controversial New Novels: "Killing Bill O'Reilly" available on Amazon.



And "Killing O'Reilly" also available on Amazon.





Visit www.uspokersite.net for US online poker related information and news.



Get started with the top online bitcoin casino and win real cash playing casino games.



As you already know by now that Oreilly sucks and is the biggest loser. Oreilly facts apart, many people spend their time on computers playing online poker real money games as a hobby playing online poker real money games as a hobby including slots



Review the best Canadian online casinos for real money slots online at SlotsOnlineCanada.com



If you are looking to buy prescription medications from Canada, then buy from a licensed Canadian pharmacy.



RealMoneyAction.com is quickly becoming the #1 source for playing online casino games for real money. Check them out



Get all the news and information you will ever need about sing mobile bingo at this top mobile bingo comparison site, there is no spin here, just great reviews.



The number one place for mobile slots is this site, they offer lots of info and exclusive free spins.



O'Reilly Sucks
Blog Archives

January - 2015
February - 2015
March - 2015
April - 2015

January - 2014
February - 2014
March - 2014
April - 2014
May - 2014
June - 2014
July - 2014
August - 2014
September - 2014
October - 2014
November - 2014
December - 2014

January - 2013
February - 2013
March - 2013
April - 2013
May - 2013
June - 2013
July - 2013
August - 2013
September - 2013
October - 2013
November - 2013
December - 2013

January - 2012
February - 2012
March - 2012
April - 2012
May - 2012
June - 2012
July - 2012
August - 2012
September - 2012
October - 2012
November - 2012
December - 2012




Website Links

O'Reilly Info

The O'Reilly Iraq Apology Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Spins

Cable News Ratings

Read The Letter O'Reilly Had His Attorney Send me

O'Reilly Wins 2004 Misinformer of The Year Award

O'Reilly Death Penalty Lies

O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 49 Times Since 2001

O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks

Mail-to-Bill

Hate-Mail

O'Reilly #5 On Top 25 Right-Wing Journalist List

O'Reilly Factor Year In Review 2009

Factor Pollster Caught Writing GOP Policy Memo

What a Fair & Balanced O'Reilly Factor Would Look Like

Transcript: Bill O'Reilly v Jeremy Glick

Peabody Award Facts

Bill Clinton Enron News

Buzzflash Names O'Reilly Media Putz of The Week

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly & The Republican Party Are Both Corrupt

The Right-Wing Liberal Killer Story O'Reilly Ignored

The Facts About O'Reilly And GE Doing Business With Iran

How to Deal With an O'Reilly Factor Ambush Interview

Why FOX News Loves Juan Williams: The Strings And The Puppet

Blogroll

ultimatetop10s.com/
AmericaBlog
Progressive Eruptions
Rude Pundit
Moveon.org
Prison Planet
Apocalypse Cafe
Fox News Boycott
Inebriated Discourse
Hannity Sucks
NewsCorpse.com
Glenn Beck Is An Idiot
Ranker.com
GlennBeckReport.com
lauraingrahamsucks.com

The Factor Guest List Count

May 2015 (1 Shows) Republicans - 7 | Democrats - 2

The Factor Guest List Count Archives

Ratings: The O'Reilly Factor - Total Viewers

Monday - 4-27-15 -- O'Reilly - No Show - Baltimore Protest Coverage
Tuesday - 4-28-15 -- O'Reilly - 3.020
Wednesday - 4-29-15 -- O'Reilly - 2.866
Thursday - 4-30-15 -- O'Reilly - 2.505
Friday - 5-1-15 -- O'Reilly - 1.729 - Juan Williams Hosted

Weekly Factor Average - 2.530 - 4 Shows

The Cable News Ratings Archives

Oreilly is a polarizing figure and so is online gaming, especially at Begado Casino. There are advocates in Congress proposing a federal law, but Republican detractors. This, according to a supporter of Steve and Oreilly-sucks.com, who runs a Begado Fan Blog. The conservative approach is to stick to legitimate gaming certifications and brands like Begado, says Zachary Gleason.


The O'Reilly Sucks Blog

Jeb Bush Admits He Loves Racist Book Author
By: Steve - May 5, 2015 - 10:00am

And of course Bill O'Reilly has not (and will not) ever say a word about it, instead he will run cover for Bush and all the other Republicans running for office, because he is a Republican.

In an interview with the National Review's Rich Lowry, Jeb Bush confessed to being a fan of Charles Murray's books. Twice during the interview, the Republican presidential hopeful professed admiration for Murray, citing the controversial author as an influential source for Bush's own ideas.

When asked if there was anything public officials could do to address family breakdown in America, Bush replied, "absolutely there is," and then he added, that his views on the question of family dissolution "were shaped a lot" by Charles Murray's writings. Later in the interview, Jeb Bush again brought up the author, saying this:
BUSH: I like Charles Murray's books to be honest with you, which means I'm a total nerd I guess.
While Bush did not specify which of Charles Murray's books he used to shape his views, he must surely be aware of the controversy surrounding Murray's most well-known book, titled the The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life.

The Bell Curve is a racism filled book that argues black people are genetically inferior to whites intellectually and that White Americans have more wealth essentially because they are more intelligent than African-Americans.

While Bush may call himself a nerd for reading Murray, there are other words that might apply. If he embraces Murray's bogus scholarship, the operative word might be racist or elitist, rather than nerd.

Murray is a staunch opponent of social programs because he argues that they are basically useless, since poor people simply have low IQs limiting the government's ability to help them.

Which is just ridiculous, because many poor people are very smart, they just grew up poor and never got the money to get an education, making Murray a total right-wing idiot.

The far-right Republican Congressmen Paul Ryan is also a devotee of Murray's writings, which may explain his burning desire to gut social programs that assist the nation's poor.

Murray's ideology is encapsulated pretty well in an article written in the year 2000, where he actually takes conservative Republicans to task for not being more explicitly elitist and racist. Murray said this:
In their own way, politicians on the Right are equally in thrall to the egalitarian premise. For example, no major Republican politician is willing to say in public that some of the social problems we most deplore are rooted to some degree in personal deficiencies. Try to imagine a GOP presidential candidate saying in front of the cameras, "One reason that we still have poverty in the United States is that a lot of poor people are born lazy."

You cannot imagine it because that kind of thing cannot be said. And yet this unimaginable statement merely implies that when we know the complete genetic story, it will turn out that the population below the poverty line in the United States has a configuration of the relevant genetic makeup that is significantly different from the configuration of the population above the poverty line. This is not unimaginable. It is almost certainly true.
To say someone is born lazy is like saying if a woman is raped she can use her will and mind to prevent getting pregnant. Which are insane things Republicans have said, both crazy and not true. Nobody is born lazy, that is just ignorant and racist. Because he is talking about blacks.

While it is no surprise that many conservatives have embraced Murray's phony science to justify their racial prejudices, it is a bit disconcerting that Jeb Bush, the supposed moderate in the Republican field, is one of them. Murray's old-fashioned racism masquerading as social science, should be soundly rejected by anyone enacting social policy.

Voters should have no issue with electing a nerd to be President, but choosing someone who admits he is guided in his views by a known ignorant racist is not an option. While Jeb Bush may not view himself as an elitist or a racist, if he takes his cues from Charles Murray, his policies will demonstrate that he is both. And America cannot afford to give him that opportunity.

Republican New York Senate Leader To Be Arrested On Corruption Charges
By: Steve - May 4, 2015 - 10:00am

And of course O'Reilly has not said one word about it. But when the Democrat Sheldon Silver was charged with corruption O'Reilly reported it as a Talking Points Memo, did numerous segments on it, and had follow up segments on it over months and months.

Basically, when Democrats are charged with something it's big news and breaking news for O'Reilly, when Republicans are charged he never even reports it, let alone do follow up or report the verdict. Here is the story.

According to The New York Times, authorities are expected to arrest New York Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos (R) on federal corruption charges some time next week. Skelos has served in the New York Senate for over thirty years.

Skelos has been under investigation for allegedly engaging in a scheme to benefit AbTech Industries, in exchange for them hiring his son as a consultant. Skelos son, Adam, is also expected to be arrested. Adam Skelos also reportedly received a 20,000 dollar payment from American Land Services, a title insurance company, even though he never actually worked for them.

Skelos arrest comes three months after his Democratic counterpart in the lower house, Assembly Majority Speaker Sheldon Silver, was arrested on corruption charges, alleging that he extorted money from political donors. So it looks like the culture of corruption in Albany is bi-partisan, but you would never know that if you get your news from the Factor.

That corruption runs deep, as the Senate Republican who would be next in line to replace Skelos as Majority Leader is also under federal indictment. Thomas W. Libous is the second highest ranking Republican in the State Senate, but he faces accusations that he lied to federal agents during a corruption investigation. His son was even recently convicted for committing tax fraud.

And I would bet that almost every single politician we have could be found to be guilty of some kind of corruption, if you dig deep enough. But O'Reilly only reports on the corruption by Democrats, he ignores what all the Republicans do.

With so many elected officials under investigation or facing arrest, legislative progress in New York State has nearly ground to a halt. Corruption investigations have dogged both chambers of the New York legislature.

The state legislature has become a revolving door where powerful politicians enter distributing favors, only to be later spun around and sent out, under a dark cloud of federal corruption charges.

Skelos impending arrest hardly comes as a surprise, but it does underscore just how pervasive corruption has become in Albany. Citizens deserve honest, accountable and responsive government. Too many constituents in New York State are being represented by criminals rather than responsible lawmakers.

While it will probably take even more arrests to empty the trash in Albany, Skelos arrest at least provides hope that prosecutors will continue to root out corruption in New York politics by putting those accused of engaging in it on trial.

Maher Takes Republicans To School Pointing Out What Obama Got Right
By: Steve - May 3, 2015 - 11:00am

Bill Maher schooled Republicans on their foreign policy failures while delivering a lesson on President Obama's successes.

Maher did part of the segment in the style of Romper Room's Do Bee/Don't Bee. Romper Room went off in 1994, which is a shame because Misters Do Bee and Don't Bee would have been perfect to help us illustrate our national Do This, Not That Day.

For example, after an attack on America, Mr. Don't Bee panics and invades the wrong country. Mr. Do Bee focuses on the real attacker and shoots him in the face.

-- Mr. Don't Bee makes up stories about nukes in Iraq that don't exist.
-- Mr. Do Bee makes a treaty with Iran, so that they don't build nukes at all.
-- Mr. Don't Bee tortures prisoners.
-- Mr. Do Bee says that sounds bad.
-- Mr. Don't Bee gets his actionable intel from Jesus.
-- Mr. Do Bee gets his from tapping your phone.
-- Mr. Do Bee's best foreign policy move brings our casualty rate down by about sixty-percent.
-- Mr. Don't Bee's best foreign policy move was dodging a shoe.

We've learned nothing. The Republican campaign trail today is the same empty tough-guy talk from chicken hawks. The same as it was in 2003.

Every time that Democrats bring up Bush and their party's many failures, Republicans respond that Democrats are living in the past, but it isn't the Democrats who are living in the past.

Consider that the Republican foreign policy ideology hasn't changed since Bush declared Mission Accomplished twelve years ago. Republican members of Congress and presidential candidates are trying to destroy the deal with Iran on their nuclear program while refusing to take war with Iran off the table.

Republicans are itching to repeat the failures of the Bush foreign policy. The party's frontrunner not only shares a set of parents with the former president, he also shares a staff and an ideology. Republicans got it all wrong on foreign policy, and Obama got it right.

At home, Republicans are wrong when they claim that tax cuts create jobs. They were completely wrong about the Affordable Care Act. They are wrong on same-sex marriage, immigration reform, and women's rights. They are wrong in their belief that the country can cut its way to a balanced budget. On issue after issue, they are wrong.

If Republicans nominate Jeb Bush, they will confirm the obsession with their failed past. Bill Maher needed to explain the mistakes in childlike terms because Republicans are like little children who are stuck in a never ending state of failure.

Some Bail Amounts In Baltimore Are Biased And Out Of Control
By: Steve - May 3, 2015 - 10:00am

An 18 year old who participated in riots on Saturday in Baltimore now faces an insane bail of $500,000 dollars, something his family cannot afford and a higher bail than the cops involved in the death of Freddie Gray Jr.

Allen Bullock, who was photographed in the act of smashing a police car, faces eight criminal charges -- all misdemeanors -- including rioting and malicious destruction of property. His stepfather, Maurice Hawkins, encouraged Bullock to turn himself in.

Now, he faces bail that far exceeds his family's ability to pay. "By turning himself in he also let me know he was growing as a man and he recognized what he did was wrong," his mother, Bobbi Smallwood, told The Guardian. "It is just too much money."

The police officers who were charged on Friday by Maryland State's Attorney Marilyn Mosby in the death of 25 year old Gray posted bail bonds of $250,000 to $350,000 each.

Since Gray's death, there have been protests, some becoming violent, over the lack of accountability regarding Gray's death. During a press conference on Friday, Mosby reiterated that Gray had not committed any crime when the six police officers she charged apprehended him.

Bullock's parents are part of a larger pattern of racial disparities in the cities. Blacks in Baltimore are less likely to be employed, more likely to face predatory lending, and even have a shorter life expectancy on average. The city of Baltimore has also settled more than $5.7 million in wrongful death cases with Baltimore citizens since 2011.

The problem of racial or ethnic minorities being hit with higher bail amounts than their white counterparts is also well documented. The Sentencing Project pointed out in a report released last year that "blacks and Latinos are more likely than whites to be denied bail or to be imposed a bond that they cannot afford" and that they are more often considered "flight risks because of their lower socioeconomic status, criminal records, and because of their race."

"As parents we wanted Allen to do the right thing," Smallwood said. "He was dead wrong and he does need to be punished. But he wasn't leading this riot. He hasn't got that much power."

That bail should be reduced. It can be and I hope it will be. This inequality in treatment can't be allowed to continue. And they wonder why blacks riot and do this stuff, because of things like this, they know they are being treated unfairly, and unless the media reports it nobody else knows. Which of course rarely ever gets reported.

And of course, Bill O'Reilly never reports any of this information, because he defends the cops and the justice system, even when it is unjust and unfair. Bill O'Reilly ignores this mistreatment and unfairness because he does not really care about the rights of blacks being violated, he just says he does to make it look good on tv.

Fox Host Sides With Cops After Officers Charged
By: Steve - May 2, 2015 - 11:00am

Fox News host Todd Starnes immediate reaction to the breaking news that all six officers are being charged in the death of Freddie Gray in Baltimore was to accuse State's Attorney Marilyn J. Mosby of declaring war on law enforcement.

This is the refrain of many people who have a hard time admitting that we have a systemic problem of racial bias within all tiers of our justice system.

But the real question is why would anyone defend police officers who are not upholding the law? These bad actors do not reflect on all law enforcement. The few bad actors stain the name of all of the hard working police in this country. For that reason, everyone should want to weed out the bad actors and hold them accountable.

The highest charge against the officers is that of second-degree depraved heart murder. According to Wikipedia, depraved heart murder is also known as "depraved-indifference murder." This "demonstrates a 'callous disregard for human life' and results in death."

In what world does holding an officer/officers accountable for having a callous disregard for human life equal "declaring war"? If Starnes feels that being asked to behave lawfully is an act of war, he has other problems.

Starnes might also want to realize that the State's Attorney is law enforcement. She is responsible for upholding the law. The State's Attorney repeatedly said that this was not an indictment of the Baltimore Police Department, but of the six officers charged in this case.

Mosby used an independent investigation in order to determine the facts, instead of leaving it up to the police to investigate their fellow officers.

There is no excuse for turning these charges around on the prosecutor and claiming victimization by whining that being held to the law is an act of war. The point of these charges is that everyone is expected to uphold the law, including the police. They are, in fact, supposed to be setting the standards for upholding the law.

For every bad police action getting headlines right now, the majority of police officers are trying their best to honor the public trust and keep the peace, often under trying circumstances. Instead of defending the few bad actors, which implies an identification with their actions, it makes more sense to hold everyone accountable to the same standards.

Since most police do not treat citizens with callous disregard for their life, there is no reason to view these charges as anything other than the result of an independent investigation. The justice system will work its way through these charges just as it does for every person charged with a crime; the officers are entitled to due process just as anyone else is.

By Starnes standards, law enforcement is declaring war on every person ever charged with a crime. So to follow through with his logic, everyone who has been charged with a crime should respond that the police are declaring an act of war on everyone who shares something in common with them.

Yeah, that's nuts.

Todd Starnes accusation is irresponsible at best. He has no evidence to suggest these charges are unwarranted, but that didn't stop him from inflaming the situation with the sort of self-pity often seen in people of privilege when they are held accountable for their actions.

Baltimore PD Release Mugshots Of Officers Charged In Freddie Gray Death
By: Steve - May 2, 2015 - 10:00am

The Baltimore Police Department tonight released mugshots of the six officers charged in the death of Freddie Gray while in police custody.

The officers were identified last month as Lt. Brian Rice, Officer Garrett Miller, Sgt. Alicia White, Officer William Porter, Officer Edward Nero, and Officer Caesar Goodson.

Baltimore State's Attorney Marilyn Mosby has found that the death of Freddie Gray was a homicide, and warrants have been issued for the arrest of six Baltimore police officers.

According to The Baltimore Sun, "Six officers are each facing multiple charges, including manslaughter, assault, misconduct in office and false imprisonment: Lt. Brian Rice, Sgt. Alicia White, Officer William Porter, Officer Garrett Miller, Officer Edward Nero and Officer Caesar Goodson. Goodson, who drove the van, has been charged with second-degree murder."

Mosby stressed that the officers must be held accountable and that her investigation was about justice and accountability. The State's Attorney added, "I heard your call for no justice, no peace. Your peace is sincerely needed as I work to deliver justice on behalf of this young man."

Rough Rides And The Challenges Of Improving Police Culture
By: Steve - May 1, 2015 - 10:00am

Police say that intentionally banging a suspect around in the back of a van isn't common practice. But the range of slang terms to describe the practice suggests it's more common that anyone would hope--and a roster of cases show that Freddie Gray is hardly the first person whose serious injuries allegedly occurred while in police transit.

Citizens have accused police of using aggressive driving to rough suspects up for decades in jurisdictions across the country. Though experts don't think it's a widespread practice, rough rides have injured many people, frayed relationships, and cost taxpayers, including Baltimore's, millions of dollars in damages.

Protests have roiled the streets of Baltimore ever since Gray died, forcing the city to reckon with a troubled police department and its fraught relationship with black citizens. On Monday, those protests intensified. A spokesman for the Baltimore Police Department said seven officers had been injured and one was non-responsive.

Despite the turmoil, there's been little new information about how Gray sustained his mortal injuries. Initial reports focused on how it was that Gray got into a van while alive--though he was being dragged--yet emerged less than an hour later unable to breathe or walk.

The question has always been what happened in the van--including during several van stops before Gray arrived at a police station and paramedics were called--but now more scrutiny has come on Gray's state when he was arrested.

Initially, reports suggested that Gray took off running after making eye contact with an officer, and was found with a knife. Police also said the 25-year-old was not injured when he got into the van. A video shot by a bystander was inconclusive and didn't show any evidence of Gray being beaten, though he was shouting and his legs appeared limp as he was dragged to the van.

An extensive report from The Baltimore Sun suggests there are some inconsistencies even in the limited timeline police have released. Police said Gray was arrested a minute after first contact with officers, and was handcuffed "without force or incident."

Conversations with witnesses "make clear that Gray's arrest and transport were perceived as being wholly out of the ordinary--even in an area where the drug trade makes an arrest a common occurrence," the Sun's Mark Rector reports. Once police caught Gray, a friend saw one officer with his knee on Gray's neck and another bending his legs back.

In video of the arrest, a bystander shouts that Gray's legs are broken and he needs help. He was then placed in the van and driven away. Police now say he should have received medical attention at the scene. Because the investigation didn't start for several days, they also missed opportunities to gather crucial evidence, like a surveillance tape from a store that was taped over.

That's why the van, and the alleged "rough ride," remains central. While medical professionals said the level of damage to Gray's spinal cord--which was 80 percent severed, with a crushed voice box--was the sort of injury that usually only happened in a serious car accident, Dr. Ali Bydon, a Johns Hopkins neurosurgeon, told the Sun that it could have happened progressively, so that the fact that Gray could stand when he got into the van proves nothing.

"It can be a progressive, cumulative loss of function if the spinal cord is unstable and unprotected," he said. "You don't need tremendous force to follow up on further injury to the spine--a force you and me can take because we have stable necks, but that an unstable neck cannot withstand."

Once Gray was in the van, he was handcuffed. Apparently because he was "irate" during the ride, officers stopped and shackled his legs, too. The one thing they didn't do was buckle his seat belt. Not only does that sound like common sense, it's also department policy--and the BPD admits it was violated.

Critics argue that the reason a prisoner would be left unbuckled is not to protect officers but to dole out extrajudicial treatment. Baltimore juries have on occasion agreed. In 2004, a man named Jeffrey Alston won $39 million from Baltimore after he was paralyzed from the neck down during a police-van ride.

The following year, Dondi Johnson Sr. won $7.4 million after a ride left him a paraplegic. In 2013, Johns Hopkins librarian Christine Abbott filed a suit against the department for a "rough ride" after a 2012 arrest that resulted from a noise complaint. Her lawyer alleges she was not buckled and an officer drove "maniacally" as she was taken in, throwing her around the unpadded van.

Arrestees and advocates say drivers will jam to abrupt stops and take corners hard to toss riders around. In addition to rough rides, my colleague Conor Friedersdorf notes, the Baltimore Police Department has a long and ignominious rap sheet of brutality not befitting a place that calls itself Charm City.

As one might expect, it's hard to know how common this practice is, and there are no good tallies. The multiplicity of slang terms is one metric. "Bringing them up front" refers to jamming on the breaks so a prisoner flies forward. "Screen tests" are the same, so that a prisoner rams into the screen between the front seat and the passenger area of a van or cruiser.

In Philadelphia, the practice is commonly known as a "nickel ride," a reference to cheap amusement-park rides. The Philadelphia Inquirer published a gripping investigation into nickel rides in 2001. The newspaper found 20 cases of injuries, including three spinal injuries and two instances of paralysis. Settlements had cost taxpayers at least $2.3 million at the time, but no Philadelphia cop had been disciplined for the practice. After the Inquirer investigation, the department agreed to end the practice, but a 2013 lawsuit alleged it had been quietly reintroduced.

Even if rough rides are only a tiny element of the police culture, it will take a cultural shift to root them out, the sort of change that marches and national attention can't effect on their own.

Hannity: Lesson Of Gray's Death Is "Don't Run When You See A Cop"
By: Steve - April 30, 2015 - 11:00am

And as usual Hannity has it all wrong, because the lesson is why are there so many bad cops in police jobs. They are trained and they violate that training to rough people up. That sometimes lead to their death. The lesson should be that we need to get rid of the bad cops, and as far as I know, killing someone is not justification for trying to run away.

Not to mention this, the problem started after he was taken into custody, he was fine when they put him in the police van, then after he is at the police station he is out. That means the cops did something to him in the back of that van on tha way to the police station, and that is a fact, but Hannity says he has no idea what happened.

He said this:
HANNITY: I got to be honest, I don't know what the answer to the question is. I don't know why it happened. I know this, I don't know why the kid ran. What is the mindset of someone, they see a cop and they gotta run. Maybe his record had something to do with it. What happened between the time he ran and the time he got in that truck and the time he got some medical care, we don't know what happened yet. It's suspicious to me. But I'm not rushing to judgment.

And his record I mentioned earlier -- it has nothing to do with -- you know, what happened in this case. I assume that it probably was connected to why he ran and his relationship with police at that time. I mean it's pretty extensive. You know there's a simple solution in terms of for other people going forward is: don't be involved in the sale of drugs, don't think police are your enemies, don't run at 8:30 in the morning when you see a cop, and certainly that is a part that he plays in this equation.
What happened is the cops roughed him up in the van, and then did not get him medical help in time to prevent his death, there is no other answer. A simple arrest turned into a man getting killed, while in police custody, so Sean, it's not that hard to figure out, and you are an idiot for saying you do not know what happened.

Those cops killed him somehow, that is a fact, and they should all be put on trial for it. And the people who watch the Hannity show should be checked to see if they have mental problems.

O'Reilly: Racial Persecution Is Not The Problem In Baltimore
By: Steve - April 30, 2015 - 10:00am

Bill O'Reilly: "Racial Persecution Really Isn't The Problem In Baltimore," It's "Personal Behavior"

O'Reilly: It's "Long Past Time For African-American Communities Across America To Begin To Police Themselves"



So let me get this straight, blacks in Baltimore should just let the police abuse and kill them for no reason, and then sit around and do nothing. Wow, O'Reilly seems to get more insane every day, that is just nuts.

Then he said they should police themselves, and if they did then he would say that is chaos and you have to let law enforcement do it. Bill O'Reilly is a right-wing hack of a cable tv news guy, and white. He has no idea what it is like to be a black man that is constantly abused by police, and he has no idea what to do about it.

The answer is to put body cameras on all police, that can not be turned off. Then we would be able to see just what these cops are doing, and get rid of the bad apples. Until they do that police abuse and law breaking will continue, the people know what they cops are doing and since it is not on video they can not prove it.

If we had body cameras the cops would not be able to abuse their authority, and if they do they will get in trouble or even fired for it. O'Reilly said the problem is the people, and he is dead wrong, the problem is the bad cops who abuse their power, and we know there are a lot of them. I have run into some bad cops myself, but I have also seen many good cops.

What we have to do is get rid of the bad cops, it is that simple, and until we do there are going to be more riots and protests, as more video comes out showing the cops violating the law.

Senator Sanders Gives Jobs Reality Check On GOP Budget
By: Steve - April 29, 2015 - 11:00am

Senator Bernie Sanders, the Independent from Vermont dropped a truth bomb on Senate Republicans by revealing that their budget (if passed) would wipe out more than 2.3 million jobs.

Sanders sent letters to the governors of all 50 states that broke down the cuts and job losses that each state would face if the Republican budget is passed. The main point of the letters is that the Republican cuts to transportation, education, and other programs would kill more than 2.3 million jobs across the country.

And of course, the biased right-wing stooge Bill O'Reilly has not reported one word about this, because he is a Republican and he is covering for his right-wing friends in Congress.

In a statement, Sen. Sanders said this:
The Republican budget moves this country in exactly the wrong direction. At a time of massive wealth and income inequality, it gives huge tax breaks to millionaires and billionaires while making devastating cuts to education, Medicare, affordable housing and prescription drug coverage.

Instead of creating jobs, it will lead to the elimination of more than 2 million jobs.

Instead of making college more affordable, it will increase the cost of college for millions of Americans.

Instead of eliminating hunger in America, it will add to the financial problems of low-income families with children and will create more hunger. This budget is the Robin Hood principle in reverse. It takes from the poor to give to the rich.
And some of the hardest hit states would be those that have Republican governors. Texas would lose 193,000 jobs. Florida would lose 141,000 jobs. Ohio would lose 84,000 jobs. Georgia would lose 70,000 jobs. North Carolina would lose 68,000 jobs, and Wisconsin would lose 46,000 jobs.

It is important that the American people understand exactly what the Republican party budget does. Not only does the Republican budget lower taxes for the wealthiest people while raising them for everyone else, it also kills millions of jobs.

Republicans in Congress don't want to talk about how many services will be cut, and jobs lost because of their budget. Republicans especially don't want to discuss the number of jobs that will be lost in red states due to their budget.

Sanders is exposing the things that Republicans don't want to talk about. He is revealing the ugly truth behind the GOP's economic ideology, and in the process, he is destroying any potential support for their economic ideas outside of the Republican Party.

Sanders has become the tip of the spear that is striking back against failed Republican economic policies and income inequality.

Insane Fox News Idiots Blame Obama For Violence In Baltimore
By: Steve - April 29, 2015 - 10:00am

Fox Business host Lou Dobbs and Fox News contributor Keith Ablow blamed President Obama and his administration for violence in the wake of the mysterious death of Freddie Gray, who died a week after suffering an unexplained injury while in the custody of Baltimore police officers.

On April 19th, 25-year-old Freddie Gray died of a spinal cord injury that he mysteriously suffered after being arrested on April 12 by police officers. After Gray's funeral on April 27, the governor of Maryland declared a state of emergency in Baltimore and activated the National Guard to respond to violence and looting in the city that resulted in injury to at least 15 police officers.

On the April 27th edition of Lou Dobbs Tonight, the host Lou Dobbs responded to the events by blaming the violence against the police on Obama, asserting that "there is a war on law enforcement" that is being "corroborated if not condoned by this administration."

Later during the show, Dobbs invited Fox contributor Keith Ablow to comment, and he also blamed Obama for the violence, adding that people who want to tear down the system like the people in Baltimore might be taking their cues from this president:
DOBBS: I'd like to begin with what drives, in your judgment, a police department and a mayor, who basically have given a free pass to those who are tearing up property, and injuring others, including law enforcement?

ABLOW: What drives them is a lack of respect for the foundation of governing and foundation of law upon which this nation rests. Contempt for such things and a kind of tacit acceptance, that protests can be violent because people are so frustrated. But the bottom line Lou, is that if you want to change things, you work within the system, that is the way it has always been.

If you want to tear down the system, you might be taking your cues, by the way, from a president who has given the appearance that there is every justification for any level of anger at our country because we're such despicable people.
While reporting on the protests earlier in the day, Fox News Shep Smith urged his colleagues to report on the protests objectively by "for now, just covering what happens," instead of indicting the community.

But of course they did not listen to him, and some of them blamed Obama for it, which is just insane. The people to blame are the cops who wrongfully killed Freddie Gray, and the people who did the violence.

And the worst part is that if a liberal blames someone in politics for a protest or violence by Republicans, the people at Fox and Republicans deny it and say there is personal accountability for what each person does. They say the only person to blame is the person who is involved in the violence or the protests.

But somehow when liberals are involved in protests or violence, Republicans blame Obama or someone else, even though he had nothing to do with it. It's the ultimate hypocrisy and a total double standard.

Bill O'Reilly does the very same thing, when he slammed Dr. Tiller over and over on his show for months on end, calling him Tiller the baby killer and saying he was evil, then someone on the right went and killed Dr. Tiller and some people said O'Reilly was partly to blame, O'Reilly denied it and said he had nothing to do with it.

Then a rap artist will put out a rap song that talks about sex and violence and a kid will do something involved with sex or violence, and O'Reilly blames it on the rap song, instead of saying they should have personal accountability for what they did. He says one thing when it involves him ,but another when it does not.

Bill O'Reilly Violates His Own Disclosure Rules
By: Steve - April 28, 2015 - 11:00am

Bill O'Reilly is the so-called Mr. disclosure. He calls for full disclosure from Obama, all the Democrats, and all the liberals. If anyone at MSNBC does not disclose everything at all times O'Reilly loses his mind and calls for the host or MSNBC guest to be fired or punished.

For example, the other day an MSNBC host did an interview with a political analyst who worked for MSNBC that was favorable to Hillary Clinton. The political analyst had a wife who worked as a staffer for Hillary, and that was not disclosed. Even though the wife was not a guest, and was not on the show.

But O'Reilly lost his mind and slammed MSNBC for the non-disclosure.

Now get this, Karl Rove is the senior political analyst for Fox News. And he is one of the most dishonest and biased political analysts on tv, he worked for George W. Bush, and many other Republicans. He was even called Bush's brain, and he is known as one of the most dirty people in politics. He has run some of the most dirty tricks campaigns in history, and he did it himself, not his wife.

O'Reilly has this stooge on the Factor at least once a week as a political analyst, to discuss Obama, Hillary, etc. And not once is there ever a Democratic guest on with him for balance, and O'Reilly also never discloses that Rove is a dishonest partisan hack who founded Crossroads GPS, that raises hundreds of millions of dollars to run dishonest political ads against Democrats.

No disclosure of any of that, nothing. O'Reilly puts Rove on as if he is an Independent political analyst who is honest and has an objective opinion. This is about as dishonest as a journalist can be, by not disclosing who and what Rove is every time he is on. And yet he calls for full disclosure from everyone else in the media.

O'Reilly also complains about all the money wealthy people like George Soros give to Democrats, but he never says anything about the hundreds of millions wealthy people on the right give to Rove and Crossroads GPS. Here are some facts about Crossroads GPS, that Bill O'Reilly never discloses, or talks about.

Crossroads GPS is a conservative/Republican advocacy group that is among the biggest outside player in influencing national and state elections. Ed Gillespie, a former chairman of the Republican National Committee, and Karl Rove, who served as senior adviser to President George W. Bush, were instrumental in helping to launch American Crossroads in 2010.

American Crossroads is a so-called "super PAC," allowed to raise and spend unlimited amounts provided all donations and expenditures are reported publicly. Crossroads GPS, a 501(c)(4), was formed, according to Carl Forti, political director for American Crossroads, because some donors didn't want to be disclosed and were more comfortable giving to an entity that keeps donors names secret.

Crossroads GPS steadfastly refuses to disclose any information about who gives to it. The money raised from secret donors can be quite substantial. ProPublica's analysis of the group's tax returns found 50 anonymous contributions of more than $1 million, including one of $22.5 million.

The chairman of American Crossroads is Mike Duncan, a former Republican National Committee chairman. Its president and chief executive officer is Steven Law, a former deputy secretary of labor in the administration of George W. Bush. Law also served as general counsel to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Draft tax returns revealed that the group raised more than $325 million during the 2012 election cycle -- $9 million more than the Democratic National Committee. They reported to the Federal Election Commission that a combined $176 million of that was spent on advertising and election communications. In addition, they spent undisclosed amounts on voter turnout efforts and other activities.

That $176 million total was over $30 million more than the next-biggest outside spending group -- Restore Our Future, a pro-Mitt Romney super PAC -- and over $100 million more than the highest-spending left-leaning group, Priorities USA/Priorities USA Action.

And O'Reilly never discloses any of that information, while having Rove on the Factor as a regular weekly guest, while complaining about the money Democrats raise, and billing Rove as an objective political analyst.

In addition to the presidential election, the Crossroads groups got involved in dozens of congressional races. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, much of their spending -- $159 million -- was directed at attacking Democratic candidates.

Most of the time these attacks were full of lies, and many of their ads had to be pulled because of lies. In Nevada, Crossroads GPS spent $768,000 on a television ad that stretched the truth regarding allegations of ethical misconduct raised against Democratic Senate hopeful Shelley Berkley. And Berkley would go on to lose the election.

In Florida, American Crossroads spent $1.8 million attacking Sen. Bill Nelson for "casting the deciding vote for Obamacare." The ad also made some dishonest claims, which were refuted in "Scary Medicare Claims," warning of death panels and Medicare rationing due to the Affordable Care Act. Despite the heavy spending, Nelson would coast to victory in his bid for reelection.

American Crossroads was able to rely on a relatively small number of large donors in the election season. In all, 17 percent of its contributions came from Texas billionaire Harold Simmons and the Contran Corporation, a massive holding company he controlled. Simmons continued to lead the way for the 2014 cycle with a $1 million contribution by Contran, which ranks as the third highest contributor.

Despite the huge sums of money raised and spent by the Crossroads groups, their track record in the 2012 elections was not very good. A study by the Sunlight Foundation found that just 14 percent of the total spent by Crossroads GPS on advertising and election communications went to support candidates who went on to win, or to oppose candidates who lost.

Which just shows that no matter how much money you spend, if the people oppose your policies and your candidates you are still going to lose.

Crossroads GPS, the 501(c)(4), has spent more than $4 million opposing Colorado Sen. Mark Udall and more than $1 million each to help Republican challengers in the Arkansas, Alaska, and North Carolina Senate races.

O'Reilly never reports on this, never tells anyone about Rove being part of it, and never complains about the money they raise. But if George Soros donates a dime to a Democrat running for office, O'Reilly spends a month crying about it. Which is just more proof Bill O'Reilly is a biased right-wing stooge who may be the biggest hypocrite in the world.

State Of Emergency Declared In Maryland: National Guard Activated
By: Steve - April 28, 2015 - 10:00am

Baltimore, MD -- CBS Baltimore reports that Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan has declared a state of emergency and placed the National Guard on alert in response to the violence and turmoil in Baltimore:

The city of Baltimore announced a curfew for all residents as a turbulent day that began with the funeral of 25-year-old Freddie Gray, the nation's latest symbol of police brutality, ended with rioting by rock-throwing youths, widespread looting and at least 15 police officers injured.

"Today's looting and acts of violence in Baltimore will not be tolerated," Hogan said in a statement.

"In response, I have put the Maryland National Guard on alert so they can be in position to deploy rapidly as needed. I strongly condemn the actions of the offenders who are engaged in direct attacks against innocent civilians, businesses and law enforcement officers. There is a significant difference between protesting and violence and those committing these acts will be prosecuted under the fullest extent of the law."

By evening, the unrest was spreading, and the police said at least 27 people had been arrested. At a news conference on Monday night, Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake announced that a 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. curfew would be imposed for a week beginning on Tuesday.

"Too many people have spent generations building up this city for it to be destroyed by thugs," she said. The city already has a curfew for juveniles.

Republicans Now Trying To Save Obamacare For Political Reasons
By: Steve - April 27, 2015 - 11:00am

It's no secret that Bill O'Reilly and his Republican friends have opposed the Affordable Care Act since the very beginning. From death panels to economic Armageddon, the GOP has said and done just about anything they possibly could to make people as irrationally terrified of this law as possible.

But despite their incessant fear-mongering, basically none of their apocalyptic warnings have come true. The worst factual talking point they've had against Obamacare is that around 5 million Americans were forced to switch insurance plans because their previous plans were inadequate.

So, when I read that Senate Republicans were desperately trying to pass legislation that would extend the subsidies for the Affordable Care Act through 2017, I was caught a little off guard. After all, these are the same subsidies they have been pushing the Supreme Court to strike down for years?

So, why would Republicans want to pass legislation that guarantees the subsidies through 2017? Simple, to avoid having millions of Americans blaming the Republican party for losing their health insurance just before the 2016 elections.

Right now the debate in the Supreme Court over these subsidies essentially centers around wording in the law that could easily be fixed by Congress, nullifying any need for the court to rule on this issue at all. Of course, Republicans in Congress won't do that.

Instead, what they're trying to do is pass a temporary patch to the law so that if the court rules against it they won't be blamed for the ramifications (basically complete chaos within our health care system) just before one of the most crucial election years in our nation's history.

While it's easy for Republicans to brainwash their voters into thinking that this law is horrible, it will be an entirely different story when millions of Americans suddenly see what they are going to lose if the GOP gets its way.

If the Supreme Court rules against the subsidies, there's not going to be anyone else to blame but the Republican party -- and they know that. That's why they're trying to pass this temporary fix so that they won't have to suffer any sort of political ramifications for being the ones responsible for millions of Americans potentially losing their health insurance.

It really is astonishing how stupid Republicans treat conservative voters -- yet their voters seem to eat it right up. Republicans couldn't be any more transparent about what they're trying to do, but conservative voters couldn't seem to care less.

Clearly Republicans know the law is working and they also know millions of Americans are going to finally see just how valuable Obamacare has been if the GOP finally gets its way.

If they didn't fear that, and they truly believed this law was one of the worst things to ever happen to this country, Senate Republicans wouldn't be trying to pass an extension to the very subsidies they want struck down just to save their political asses in the 2016 elections.

Neil deGrasse Tyson Slams Media For Making Climate Change Deniers Seem Credible
By: Steve - April 27, 2015 - 10:00am

One of the biggest mistakes we make when discussing climate change is calling it a "debate," because there is no debate - it's real and human activity on the planet is the leading cause of it. When the overwhelming majority of the world's scientists -- roughly 99 percent -- all agree that human activity is causing climate change, the opinions of those who choose to deny that evidence really don't matter.

Unfortunately, the main reasons why there are so many people who deny that humans are causing climate change are: The issue has become political, meaning that many people shut off their brains and simply regurgitate talking points based on whatever their political party is telling them to believe, regardless of facts or Religion.

In this country, the Republican party is heavily backed by big oil and other various energy companies. It's an industry that stands to lose untold billions if humans were to ever embrace green energy, moving away from fossil fuels. Naturally, this has sparked a huge push by many within these industries to spend billions on fake information hoping to build doubt on scientific data pertaining to climate change much in the same way big tobacco did decades ago over the health risks of smoking.

Religion is another issue that many use as a reason to deny climate change. I've met quite a few people who deny climate change is real because they believe God controls the weather. There's really no reasoning with these people or changing their minds -- no matter what sort of factual evidence you provide, they're going to believe what they believe.

So the well known astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson had some rather choice words for the media concerning why he thinks there are so many who doubt the very real existence of climate change. "There's this journalistic ethos saying if I get one opinion then I need to get another opinion that countervails that," Tyson said. "So if I say the world is round, are you obligated to say the world is flat, lest someone think you are being biased in your reporting? Well, that's absurd."

"If you allocated column inches in proportion to the scientific consensus of experiments, there would be one sentence talking about people who deny climate change and the rest of the ten columns talking about research that supports it," he said. "But that's not what we see in the public."

And he's absolutely right. Anytime you see climate change "debated," it's almost always an equal number of people on both sides debating the issue. This, of course, projects the idea that both sides are equally represented.

They're not. To accurately “debate” this issue based on the actual representation of scientists who believe in climate change vs. those who don't, we would need to gather 100 scientists together, with 97-99 supporting human-caused climate change and 1-3 scientists on the other side arguing against it.

And I can promise you, if that's how these "debates" were being framed, those denying climate change would come off like quacks (as they should) as opposed to seeming like people with legitimate opinions, which is how they're often presented by our media.

Thankfully we have people like Tyson and Bill Nye using their fame to help raise awareness of this very real problem, because if we don't do something to try to reverse the damage we're doing to our planet soon, it's gong to be too late.

Right-Wing Ted Cruz Skipped Lynch Confirmation Vote For A Fundraiser
By: Steve - April 26, 2015 - 11:00am

After railing against it, Republican presidential candidate hopeful and Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) missed the Loretta Lynch confirmation vote on Thursday because he had to fl back to Texas for a Dallas fundraiser for himself, hosted by investor Tom Hicks.

Cruz likes to talk a big game, blaming his fellow Republicans for things that he himself can't even be bothered to show up for. The Republican Senator from Texas said, "The Republican majority, if it so chose, could defeat this nomination. But the Republican majority has chosen to go forward and allow Loretta Lynch to be confirmed."

Then he apparently put on a big swagger about how Republicans would have to explain their vote back home, a problem Cruz rarely has since he never shows up to do his job and vote.

From The Hill:
Cruz also suggested that Republicans who supported Lynch would have to explain their votes back in their home states.

"I would note there are a few voters back home that are asking what exactly is the difference between a Democratic and Republican majority," he said. "That's a question each of us will have to answer to our constituents back home."
And btw folks, when Democrats who are in Congress run for President O'Reilly makes a big deal about all the votes they miss while on the campaign tour, but when Republicans like Ted Cruz do the exact same thing, O'Reilly never says a word. To this day, O'Reilly has not said one word about Cruz missing all those votes, even after Cruz said other Republicans would have to explain their votes to the folks back home.

Senator Cruz ranks 97th in the first three months of 2015 in showing up for votes. He has also missed the majority of committee hearings.

And it gets worse:
According to a report from Politico late last month, Cruz missed out on discussions about Afghanistan, the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, spending cuts, military readiness and the appropriate level of compensation for the troops.

Cruz was also the only senator absent on Wednesday when the Senate voted 99-0 to pass a compromise human trafficking bill that ended a contentious fight over federal abortion funding restrictions that had stalled the confirmation vote on attorney general nominee Loretta Lynch.
Which is so Ted Cruz, he puts on a great show, condemning his fellow Republicans and slamming Democrats. But in reality, he is not doing much except enriching Ted Cruz. Just like he did when he shut down the government and left the taxpayers with the bill for it.

The good thing for Cruz is he almost never votes on anything, so he does not have an actual record.

It's all about his inflammatory rhetoric. He can say whatever he wants, he doesn't need to worry about backing it up with action let alone reality, because he is never dealing with the consequences of what he says.

This is done on purpose, so the person running against Cruz can not use his voting record in the Senate against him. If you do not vote on anything you have no record to attack, it's a political strategy to cover for a far-right extreme and unqualified presidential candidate.

O'Reilly Once Called It Nutty For A SC Justice To Recuse Himself
By: Steve - April 26, 2015 - 10:00am

But only when that Supreme Court Justice is a conservative. In 2006 O'Reilly Didn't Care That Justice Scalia Gave A Speech On A Pending Case That Made His Vote "Obvious"

Bill O'Reilly has called on Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan to recuse themselves from the upcoming marriage equality cases -- even though neither justice has confirmed how they will rule.

But in 2006, the conservative O'Reilly took the opposite position when it came to Justice Antonin Scalia, despite the fact that O'Reilly admitted a speech the conservative justice gave on a pending case made it "obvious" how he would vote.

On the April 21st edition of The O'Reilly Factor, O'Reilly complained that, because Justices Ginsburg and Kagan had officiated four same-sex marriages, "these ladies have to recuse themselves."

Even though neither justice has spoken specifically on the merits of the same-sex marriage cases -- a situation that could trigger a need for a recusal -- O'Reilly nevertheless claimed that they were "not impartial" due to their participation in same-sex wedding ceremonies, and that their refusal to step down "is what unlimited power looks like."

The following night O'Reilly doubled down at the end of his show, and described the logic of a viewer who agreed with him as "impeccable," declaring the liberal justices' acts a "blatant conflict of interest."

But O'Reilly felt quite differently about the standards of recusal in 2006, when he claimed that only the "nutty left" wanted Scalia to recuse himself in Hamdan v. Rumseld, a case brought by a Guantanamo Bay prisoner who argued that his detention after 9/11 violated his rights under military and international law.

On March 8, 2006, just weeks before the Court heard oral arguments in Hamdan, Scalia gave a speech at the University of Freiberg in Switzerland, where he asserted that people who had been designated as enemy combatants -- like the prisoner in the Hamdan case -- could not enforce their rights in federal court.

Scalia stated that "War is war, and it has never been the case that when you captured a combatant you have to give them a jury trial in your civil courts ... Give me a break."

In response to an audience member who asked whether detainees had rights under the Geneva Convention -- one of the exact issues raised in Hamdan -- Scalia replied, "I'm not about to give this man who was captured in a war a full jury trial. I mean it's crazy."

As Michael Isikoff from Newsweek explained, "the comments provoked 'quite an uproar'" because the case hadn't been heard yet, but Scalia had "already spoken his mind about some of the issues in the matter."

Quoting Stephen Gillers, a professor of law and legal ethics expert, Isikoff added: "As these things mount, a legitimate question could be asked about whether he is compromising the credibility of the court."

But on the March 28, 2006, edition of The Radio Factor, O'Reilly pushed back on the "legitimate question" of recusal, even though he admitted the comments indicated "Scalia's not going to vote for civilian trials for terrorists":
O'REILLY: Finally, chief justice -- not chief justice but Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia made some comments about how captured terrorists should be treated by the USA. Now, the Supreme Court is going to hear -- going to hear a case where the crazy left wants all of the captured terrorists to be tried in civilian court, no matter where they're caught.

This is insane. But that's what the far left wants. Now, Scalia was in Switzerland and said this.

SCALIA: We are in a war here capturing these people on the battlefield. We never gave a trial in civil courts to people captured in war. We captured a lot of Germans during World War II, and they were brought not to Guantánamo, but to the soil of the United States. We didn't give them a trial.

O'REILLY: All right, so obviously, Scalia's not going to vote for civilian trials for terrorists, and I don't think most of the other Supreme Court people will either. But now, the nutty left wants Scalia to recuse himself from the vote. You know, it's just the same -- on and on and on and on. But these nuts -- aye-aye-aye.
Which is just more proof O'Reilly is a biased right-wing hack with two different standards, one for Democrats and one for Republicans.

O'Reilly Spins Out Propaganda Demanding Ginsburg & Kagan Recusal
By: Steve - April 25, 2015 - 11:00am

In the lead up to next week's landmark Supreme Court hearings on the constitutionality of marriage equality, Fox News Bill O'Reilly is amplifying a fringe -- and absurd -- right-wing campaign calling on Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elana Kagan to recuse themselves because they have officiated same-sex marriages.

Even though these actions, along with Ginsburg's comments noting the American public is rapidly turning against anti-LGBT discrimination, are not grounds for legitimate recusal.

In January, the American Family Association (AFA) -- a notorious right-wing anti-gay hate group -- announced a campaign titled, "Kagan and Ginsburg: Recuse Yourselves!"

In a statement, the AFA, best known for its infamous anti-gay spokesman Bryan Fischer, called on the justices to recuse themselves ahead of next week's oral arguments before the Supreme Court on same-sex marriage.

The group argued that Kagan and Ginsburg "should recuse themselves from making any same-sex marriage decisions because they have both conducted same-sex marriage ceremonies."

On April 20th, Fox News legal correspondent Shannon Bream twice reported on "public calls, petition drives, and appeals directly to Justices Ginsburg and Kagan to recuse themselves from hearing next week's case on same-sex marriage."

During Fox News Special Report, Bream pointed to the justices past history officiating same-sex weddings and a February 2015 interview during which Ginsburg said that it "would not take a large adjustment" for Americans to get used to nationwide marriage equality.

On April 21st, Bill O'Reilly picked up the argument in his "Is It Legal" segment on The O'Reilly Factor, declaring "these ladies have to recuse themselves," because "the Supreme Court is supposed to be an incorruptible institution, but reports say Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg has herself performed three gay marriages, and Justice Elena Kagan, one."

O'Reilly's ridiculous recusal standard, if taken seriously, would lead to absurd results.

Even conservatives have noted, when defending Justice Antonin Scalia's frequent diatribes and associations on contentious social and policy issues, that the principles of recusal should not extend beyond the details and merits of the specific case at hand.

Otherwise, judges would be prohibited from involving themselves with all sorts of topics in American society. Although O'Reilly and his guest, Fox News legal analyst Kimberley Guilfoyle, had no problem questioning the "impartiality" of Ginsburg and Kagan because they were "going out of their way to perform same-sex marriages," they did NOT do the same for the conservative justices who decline to do so.

In other words, O'Reilly and the right should also ask the conservative judges who refuse to perform same-sex marriages to recuse themselves, but they do not. They only want the more liberal judges to recuse themselves because they support same-sex marriage.

Nor did O'Reilly or Guilfoyle mention Scalia's partiality on marriage equality, even though he has frequently reaffirmed his antipathy toward civil rights protections for LGBT people. In a 2013 interview with New York magazine, Scalia commented, "maybe the world is spinning toward a wider acceptance of homosexual rights."

When asked about his dissent in Lawrence v. Texas, where he wrote that Americans had the right to "protect themselves and their families from a lifestyle that they believe to be immoral and destructive," Scalia said this:
I would write that again. But that's not saying that I personally think it's destructive. Americans have a right to feel that way. They have a democratic right to do that, and if it is to change, it should change democratically, and not at the ukase of a Supreme Court.
Bream's earlier report on the "growing calls" for Ginsburg and Kagan to recuse themselves is also ridiculous, because it's only the far-right who are asking for them to recuse themselves.

Bream turned to right-wing National Review Online contributor Ed Whelan, an anti-gay marriage crusader, to hype the campaign to remove Kagan and Ginsburg ahead of next week's hearings.

But Bream failed to report that the campaign is led by the AFA and the National Organization for Marriage (NOM), two far-right fringe anti-gay hate groups whose baseless campaign has gone largely ignored by mainstream media outlets.

In fact, a Nexis search found no mainstream media mentions of the campaign since February of this year. Nevertheless, O'Reilly and Fox News has promoted the biased right-wing campaign against Ginsburg and Kagan, claiming that Ginsburg's comments on same-sex marriage were "drawing the most heat."

Polls Show Hillary Still Crushing Every Possible Republican Candidate
By: Steve - April 25, 2015 - 10:00am

Despite the fact that O'Reilly, Fox News, and the right-wing in America have already been dishonestly attacking Hillary Clinton for weeks, the polls show she would still crush any Republican loon that would run against her. And of course, O'Reilly does not say a word about it, because he is too busy slamming her.

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- If the presidential election were held today, it wouldn't even be close.

Hillary Clinton is crushing her potential Republican rivals by double digits in a new CNN/ORC International poll. The Republicans best showing is by Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who trails the former senator and secretary of state by 14 points.

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who hasn't even declared his candidacy yet, is behind Clinton by 17 points. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie are each 19 points behind Clinton.

Rubio and Paul have declared their candidacies, but Christie hasn't said he'll run.

Clinton is also the overwhelming favorite for the Democratic nomination, with nearly seven in 10 Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents supporting her.

Even including the poll's margin of error, Clinton would still have a double-digit lead on Rubio and the others. The poll was taken April 16-19 and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points. It was released Monday.

This is bad news for O'Reilly and the right-wing smear machine, because it shows the American people do not believe their biased propaganda. And it shows that they have little to no power with anyone except the right-wing stooges that listen to them and agree with them.

Obama Approval Ratings Are Up: O'Reilly Ignores It
By: Steve - April 24, 2015 - 11:00am

When the Obama approval ratings were going down O'Reilly reported it every time they dropped by even 1 point, but now that they are going back up he never says a word about it, proving once again he is nothing but a biased right-wing hack who hates President Obama.

Thanks to a growing economy President Obama's approval rating has reached its highest level since May of 2013. Obama is now more popular than George W. Bush, and as popular as Ronald Reagan was at the same point in their second terms.

According to the latest CNN/ORC poll, the Obama resurgence is being fueled by the growing economy. Fifty-two percent of respondents called the U.S. economy very or somewhat good while 48% said the economy was very or somewhat poor.

The President's approval rating has increased with 18-29-year-olds (57%), women (51%), Democrats (88%), and liberal Democrats (97%).

The news gets even better for Obama when his approval rating is stacked up against the previous three two-term presidents. With the exception of Bill Clinton, President Obama is faring better than or equal to the most recent two-term presidents.

Here is the approval rating for the last four two-term presidents in April of their seventh year in office:

Obama now: 48%
Bush - April 2007: 36%
Clinton - April 1999: 60%
Reagan - April 1987: 48%

Obama has the same approval rating as the right-wing hero Ronald Reagan at the same time of his second term. And yet, O'Reilly never says a word about it, while at the same time claiming Obama is not doing a good job and that he is hated by a lot of people.

At this point in his presidency, Bill Clinton held a 60% approval rating following his impeachment trial over the Monica Lewinsky scandal, largely buoyed by a strong economy. George W. Bush posted a 36% approval rating in April 2007, buffeted by the war in Iraq despite mostly positive reviews of the economy.

And the spring of Ronald Reagan's seventh year in office saw him earning a 48% approval rating from the public, a rating that was just beginning to recover from the Iran-Contra affair and didn't get any boost from a tepid economic climate.

Many supporters of the President will view his increasing approval numbers as Obama finally getting credit for the economic turnaround after pulling the country back from the brink of a potential depression when he took office, but these numbers could foreshadow a Democratic strong point in 2016.

If the economy keeps growing, which it looks like it will, Democrats will be able to run on maintaining and expanding the Obama economy.

And even with that information O'Reilly and his republican friends are arguing that a Clinton win would equal an Obama third term, but what if the American people like where the nation is heading under Obama?

The Republican attack could backfire and actually make the case for electing Hillary Clinton. President Obama has held Democrats together, and he is on the upswing.

His critics tried their best to destroy him, especially O'Reilly and Fox News, but President Obama is not only surviving, but he is also increasing his approval rating with the American people.

Hot Links

Bill O'Reilly Proves He Is A Lying Right-Wing Idiot Once Again

O'Reilly Wrong About The Constitution & Obama's Power

4 Fox Hosts Slam O'Reilly Over His Ebola Reporting

Historians & The Patton Family Rip O'Reilly's New Patton Book

Jon Stewart Slams Fox For Criticizing President While At War

Facts On The Economy Bill O'Reily Is Totally Ignoring

Under Bush O'Reilly & Fox News Did Not Blame Him For Beheadings

Study Finds Fox News Only Tells the Truth 18% of the Time

More Republican Corruption O'Reilly Has Ignored

Jon Stewart Destroys O'Reilly & Fox For Ferguson Shooting Bias

O'Reilly Caught Lying About ISIS Threat & Juan Williams

NY Times Charles Blow Says Bill O'Reilly Is The Race Hustler

Homeland Security Shows Gutfeld & Baker Are Liars

More Republican Corruption O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Cost Of Obamacare





Bill O'Reilly Is Lying To You About Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Electic Car Company Success

The Most Annoying Celebs Who Should Go Away

Bias Alert: O'Reilly Spins Presidential Election Media Study

O'Reilly & Fox Still Ignoring GOP Voter Registration Fraud Story

Biased O'Reilly Tells Romney To Call Obama A Socialist

O'Reilly Slams Obama With Dishonest Tip Of The Day

O'Reilly & Brit Hume Spin And Lie For Mitt Romney

Fox Promotes Ridiculous Study Of Doctors & Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media & Obama

Low Gas Prices Shut O'Reilly & The Repiblicans Up Fast

I Am Waiting For The O'Reilly Health Care Bill Apology

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About The Media

O'Reilly Ignores MRC Calling For Sharpton Firing

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Wrong On The Deficit

O'Reilly & Fox Lie That Obama To Blame For High Gas Prices

Scientist Group Slams Celebs Like Snooki & O'Reilly

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About America

O'Reilly & Ingraham Lied About Planned Parenthood (Again)

Fox Unemployment Chart Shows Their Right-Wing Bias

U.S. Troops Burn A Box Of O'Reilly's Books

Kelly & O'Reilly Make Up Another Green Energy Scandal

O'Reilly Ignoring All The Stock Market Increases

O'Reilly Flat Out LIED About The Debt Obama Added

O'Reilly Caught Doctoring Florida Mans E-Mail

O'Reilly Ignored Michele Bachmann Church Scandal

O'Reilly & Morris Lied About The Debt Polls

O'Reilly Hypocrisy On The West/Schultz Story

The Truth About Those Bush Tax Cuts

Number Of Tea Party Events Down 50 Percent

NWLC Says O'Reilly Statement Made Up & Offensive

Video Proof O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Hack

O'Reilly Gets It Totally Wrong On Norway Terrorist

Norway Terrorist Info O'Reilly Ignored

O'Reilly Ignoring Ensign/Coburn Hush Money Scandal

O'Reilly Calls Obama Health Care Waivers A Scam

O'Reilly Complains About Losing In His Own Poll

O'Reilly Ignores Republican Hypocrisy On Judicial Filibusters

O'Reilly Ignoring Republican Unpopularity

O'Reilly Tells GOP How To Beat Obama With Scare Tactics

O'Reilly & Fox Are Lying To You About The Debt

O'Reilly Spins The 2008 Presidential Media Study

Important Tax Information Bill O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Ignored McCain Op-Ed On Bin Laden

O'Reilly Scrubs Website & Podcast Of False Obama Claims

O'Reilly Ignored DOJ Black Panther Report

O'Reilly Still Ignoring Wisconsin Judge's Order Story

O'Reilly Ignored Jobs & Unemployment Report

Fox News Town Hall Protester Hypocrisy & Double Standards

O'Reilly & Varney Speculate About Oil Prices

O'Reilly Spins The Quinnipiac Temperature Poll

O'Reilly Proves How Stupid He Is Again

How O'Reilly Puts Out Right-Wing Propaganda

Fox News Insider Admits They Make Things Up

Luntz Admits Fox Has Anti-Obama Focus Groups

Reagan SG Says Health Care Bill Constitutional

O'Reilly Ignores Gore Answer To His Question

O'Reilly Wonders How The Moon Got There

More Republican Hate & Racism O'Reilly Has Ignored

Another Poll O'Reilly Has Totally Ignored

O'Reilly Thinks We Are Still In A Recession

O'Reilly's Nazi Comment Defense Was Laughable

Fox News The Least Trusted Cable News Network

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media (Again)

O'Reilly Claims Estate Tax A Seizure Of Property

O'Reilly Called Bernie Sanders A Loon

Bloomberg Tax Cut Poll Proves O'Reilly Was Lying

O'Reilly Ignored Positive DADT Study & Story

O'Reilly & Fox Ignore Judge Being A 9-11 Truther

More Real News O'Reilly Has Ignored

More Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Ratings

O'Reilly Got The Ireland Economic Crisis Wrong

O'Reilly Ignored The Tom Delay Conviction Story

Women Of America: You Need To Read This

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly Is Dishonest & Crazy

O'Reilly Nazi Comparison Hypocrisy

O'Reilly Ignores New Poll While Promoting Paladino

Andrew Sullivan Called O'Reilly A Dishonest Propagandist

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Nevada RCP Senate Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Right-Wing Abortion Bomber Terrorism Story

Fox & O'Reilly Ignored Friday Pro-Mosque NY Rally

O'Reilly Busted For Health Insurance Premium Lies

Most Factor Gear Made in Vietnam And China

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

O'Reilly Busted For 1st Time Retraction Lie

The Bill O'Reilly Non-Apology Shirley Sherrod Apology

O'Reilly & The Right Are Racist Idiots

O'Reilly Ignored Tea Party Express Racism Story

O'Reilly Compares Gay People To Al-Qaeda

Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Rating Polls

O'Reilly Ignored Mark Kirk Military Award Lie Story

Where Are The Sedition Charges Now O'Reilly

O'Reilly Caught In A Massive Lie About Jail Time

O'Reilly Running Ads For Emergency Food Supply

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Tea Party Militia Links

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Gallup Tea Party Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Harris Poll Showing Republicans Are Stupid

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Health Reform Bill Tax

O'Reilly Caught Lying About NEJM Health Care Survey

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

The Truth About Ratings For News Shows

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Spin Doctor

O'Reilly Spinning Fox News Most Trusted Poll

Fox News Did Not Air Hope For Haiti Telethon

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Obama Terrorism Polls

O'Reilly Caught Lying About House Ethics Committee

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Increase

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Limbaugh Racism

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Religious Festival

O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Lying About CNN

O'Reilly Caught Violating Journalistic Standards Again

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The ACLU & Racial Profiling

More Proof O'Reilly & FOX News Do Not Tell The Truth

O'Reilly Called Bruce Springsteen Un-American & Un-Patriotic

The Bill O'Reilly Senate Torture Report Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Obama Approval Numbers

FOX News Caught Lying About Obama Budget

O'Reilly Busted For Helping GOP Smear Pelosi

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Obama Earmark Promise

Military.com Report Proves O'Reilly Wrong About Homeless Vets

O'Reilly Places 7th in 2008 Wingnut of The Year Award

O'Reilly Denys Reality About Abstinence Only Programs




Proof The O'Reilly Factor is Biased Against Barack Obama
O'Reilly said he is a non-partisan Independent, who is fair to both sides, and that he has been fair to Barack Obama. To check that claim I did a 3 month study of the Factor, it started on August 1st, 2008, and ran until October 31st, 2008. I watched the Factor every night and counted the negative and positive comments for Obama and McCain.

Visit the web page I set up, and you will see the stunning bias from O'Reilly and his mostly Republican guests against Barack Obama. Then you will see there is no doubt Bill O'Reilly is a dishonest and biased Conservative. This study is conclusive proof that O'Reilly is in the tank for John McCain.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The 3 Month Factor Bias Study:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/3mbiasnumbers.htm

Proof O'Reilly Lied About The Balance on His Show
O'Reilly claims the factor is balanced, and that he personally makes sure every week he has an equal number of Republican and Democrat guests. This is a bold faced lie, and I can prove it. I put together a web page that shows the guest list from the factor for the last 2 weeks. Read it and you will see with your own eyes that Bill O'Reilly is lying when he says the factor is balanced.

And remember that we are 3 weeks before a major Presidential election, or the Republican bias numbers would be worse than it is normally. O'Reilly is actually having more Democrats on than he usually does, and the balance is still not even close. If we were not so close to an election it would be a lot worse.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The Lies About The Factor Balance:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreillybalanced.htm

O'Reilly Sucks Investigation: Dishonesty, Deception, And Bias By Bill O'Reilly
O'Reilly claims there are no Republicans or Conservative groups that rival George Soros. O'Reilly said the top three conservative tax-exempt foundations are totally dwarfed by Soros and the radical Ford Foundation. And that they have 15 times more the assets. George Soros net worth is $8.5 billion, the Ford Foundation has a net worth of $13 billion. But the seven billionaires who donate to Newt Gingrich and other right-wing causes have a combined net worth of $34.8 billion dollars.

Somehow O'Reilly claims that Soros and the Ford Foundation have 15 times more the assets than anyone on the right. When the seven billionaires alone who give money to Newt, have roughly $14 billion more than Soros and the Ford Foundation combined.

Visit the web page below to see the massive money O'Reilly has ignored from the right:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/oreilly-investigation.htm

(( Right-Wing Hate Speech Ignored by Bill O'Reilly ))
O'Reilly claims there is no hate on the right, that it's all on the left. But the way he defines hate is ridiculous, if a liberal blog or website writes an article that criticizes George W. Bush (or any Republican) O'Reilly calls it hate. When it's not hate, it's reporting the facts, there is no hate. A great example is when websites like oreilly-sucks.com, mediamatters.org, etc. criticize O'Reilly he calls it hate, and says they are hate groups who lie about him.

That is a lie, it is not hate, and they are not hate websites. There is real hate on the internet, but O'Reilly does not report it, because most of it is from the right. I have documented this hate in my blog and on a web page, all of it was ignored by Bill O'Reilly, and it was never reported on the Factor.

Visit the web page below to see the massive right-wing hate O'Reilly has ignored:

www.oreilly-sucks.com/right-wing-hate.htm


www.oreilly-sucks.com Privacy Policy

Copyright 2001 - 2014


eXTReMe Tracker