Advertise Contact About This Web Site Donate To
As you already know by now that Oreilly sucks and is the biggest loser. Oreilly facts apart, many people spend their time on computers playing online poker real money games as a hobby including slots

If you are looking to buy prescription medications from Canada, then buy from a licensed Canadian pharmacy.

Some of the most comprehensive mobile bingo reviews can be found here. Definitely no spin just honest reliable site reviews.

The number one place for mobile slots is this site, they offer lots of info and exclusive free spins.

O'Reilly Sucks
Blog Archives

January - 2016
February - 2016
March - 2016
April - 2016
May - 2016
June - 2016
July - 2016
August - 2016
September - 2016

January - 2015
February - 2015
March - 2015
April - 2015
May - 2015
June - 2015
July - 2015
August - 2015
September - 2015
October - 2015
November - 2015
December - 2015

January - 2014
February - 2014
March - 2014
April - 2014
May - 2014
June - 2014
July - 2014
August - 2014
September - 2014
October - 2014
November - 2014
December - 2014

Website Links

O'Reilly Info

The O'Reilly Iraq Apology Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Spins

Cable News Ratings

Read The Letter O'Reilly Had His Attorney Send me

O'Reilly Wins 2004 Misinformer of The Year Award

O'Reilly Death Penalty Lies

O'Reilly on Top 10 Conservative Idiot List 49 Times Since 2001

O'Reilly Calls Mexicans Wetbacks



O'Reilly #5 On Top 25 Right-Wing Journalist List

O'Reilly Factor Year In Review 2009

Factor Pollster Caught Writing GOP Policy Memo

What a Fair & Balanced O'Reilly Factor Would Look Like

Transcript: Bill O'Reilly v Jeremy Glick

Peabody Award Facts

Bill Clinton Enron News

Buzzflash Names O'Reilly Media Putz of The Week

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly & The Republican Party Are Both Corrupt

The Right-Wing Liberal Killer Story O'Reilly Ignored

The Facts About O'Reilly And GE Doing Business With Iran

How to Deal With an O'Reilly Factor Ambush Interview

Why FOX News Loves Juan Williams: The Strings And The Puppet

Progressive Eruptions
Rude Pundit
Prison Planet
Apocalypse Cafe
Fox News Boycott
Inebriated Discourse
Hannity Sucks
Glenn Beck Is An Idiot

The Factor Guest List Count

October 2016 (0 Shows) Republicans - 0 | Democrats - 0

The Factor Guest List Count Archives

Ratings: The O'Reilly Factor - Total Viewers

Monday - 9-26-16 -- O'Reilly - 4.842 - Pre-Trump/Clinton Debate Show
Tuesday - 9-27-16 -- O'Reilly - 3.387
Wednesday - 9-28-16 -- O'Reilly - 3.548
Thursday - 9-29-16 -- O'Reilly - 3.224
Friday - 9-30-16 -- O'Reilly -

Weekly Factor Average -

The Cable News Ratings Archives

Oreilly is a polarizing figure and so is online gaming, especially at Begado Casino. There are advocates in Congress proposing a federal law, but Republican detractors. This, according to a supporter of Steve and, who runs a Begado Fan Blog. The conservative approach is to stick to legitimate gaming certifications and says Zachary Gleason.

The O'Reilly Sucks Blog

O'Reilly Ignored The Fox Poll On The Clinton/Trump Debate
October 1, 2016 - 8:00am

Wednesday night O'Reilly said we should wait for the Fox News poll on the debate to come out Friday and see what the people think, he said after it comes out he will discuss it on his show.

So it came out Friday afternoon, and it shows Clinton won big time, so of course O'Reilly ignored it and never said one word about the poll. In fact, he took the night off and had the right-wing stooge Eric Bolling fill in for him Friday night, who also never mentioned the poll.

The latest Fox News poll found that both registered and likely voters thought that Hillary Clinton beat Donald Trump at the first presidential debate by a crushing margin.

Likely Voters: Clinton - 58% -- Trump - 19%
Debate Watchers: Clinton - 60% -- Trump - 22%

Registered Voters: Clinton - 57% -- Trump - 19%
Debate Watchers: Clinton - 61% -- Trump - 21%

Those are not good numbers. When even Fox News can't deny the reality of Clinton's debate victory, it only serves to make the Trump campaign's reliance on bogus online polls as proof that he won look more pathetic and desperate.

To date, there still has not been a single scientific poll conducted that showed Donald Trump winning the debate. It is difficult to remember the last time that a presidential candidate's general election debate performance was so bad that it was nearly universally agreed on that he lost.

The only people who are claiming that Trump won the debate are the completely committed Trump supporters who take everything that their candidate says as gospel truth.

What should frighten Republicans is that Trump's hardcore base of support hovers around 19%-22%. O'Reilly broke his own promise to report on the Fox debate poll, because he is a Trump supporter and he does not want to make him look bad.

In fact, O'Reilly should just take the next 6 weeks off and go to work for the Trump campaign, because it is just laughable how far in the tank O'Reilly is for Trump.

O'Reilly And Kelly Smear Police Shooting Victim Keith Scott As A Criminal
October 1, 2016 - 7:00am

For the record, his past history has nothing to do with being unjustly shot by the police that day, and that history would not be allowed as evidence in a trial. It's the same as saying a woman who was raped deserved it because of the sexy clothes she was wearing.

The two black guests on the Factor Wednesday night even told O'Reilly his past had nothing to do with the current shooting case, O'Reilly said yes it does, then he cut them both off and ended the segment to go to commercial.

Bill O'Reilly and Megyn Kelly unsurprisingly smeared Keith Lamont Scott, the latest high-profile black victim of police brutality, using his prior criminal record to deride protests in North Carolina over his death and call into question whether his killing was justified.

On his September 28 show, O'Reilly listed prior criminal offenses on Scott's record to ask whether "protesters once again jumped to false conclusions," suggesting that Scott's alleged violent history was a factor in whether police were justified in killing him.

Megyn Kelly, as well as Fox correspondent Trace Gallagher and Fox contributor Mark Fuhrman, all smeared Scott by bringing up his criminal record on The Kelly File.

The chorus of Fox figures smearing Scott is in keeping with Fox News long history of race-baiting and victim-blaming when it comes to police brutality.

Sean Hannity, perhaps the worst offender, has slandered Freddie Gray as the "lowest scum parasite in the world," was adamant that his prior arrest record mattered, because he was not a pillar of the community, and blamed Gray for his own death, because he ran at 8:30 in the morning.

Hannity has also smeared Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin, Samuel DuBose, and Philando Castille.

Likewise, Kelly is notorious for shaming and blaming black victims of police brutality. Kelly suggested that Sandra Bland's death could be due in part to her failure to obey the police officer, arguing that her death could have been averted if she had just "complied and complained later."

Kelly also interjected that the black teenage girl manhandled by a McKinney police officer "was no saint either," after bemoaning that people had "made this into a race thing."

Fox's smear campaign against black victims of police brutality extends beyond the cable network's primetime lineup: contributors, guests, and other hosts are all part of the network's long-running effort to dehumanize black victims, discredit nationwide protests over police brutality, and deflect any blame away from those who should be held accountable.

Conservative Bill Kristol Says Trump Choked In First Debate
September 30, 2016 - 8:00am

Partial transcript from the Tuesday night MTP Daily show:

BILL KRISTOL: Yeah, I think Donald Trump choked actually. I say this because Donald Trump said Mitt Romney choked in 2012. Mitt Romney had a fantastic debate performance in the first debate.

CHUCK TODD (HOST): He prepared.

KRISTOL: And pretty strong throughout. I mean he lost the campaign for various reasons, but Mitt Romney on the stage for three times, 90 minutes -- 270 minutes and did pretty well against a very debater, President Obama. And what's interesting is it wasn't inevitable that Trump would do quite as badly as he did.

The evidence was in the first 25 minutes. We basically -- I don't think the arguments are right, about trade, but he stayed on message, he pummeled Hillary Clinton for what he thought was a winning issue on his side of trade, and tied it effectively to the change versus status quo issue.

He could have done that for the next hour. Every question whatever it is he could say "Look, we can get into that later or two sentences to discuss what I said about birthers. But you know what?

This is about the future and here's the question you have to face American voters. Do you want more of the same? That's Secretary Clinton. Do you want change? Do you want to shake up Washington? Change immigration policy?"

An issue that was not mentioned. Not do foolish things like Obamacare. An issue he never mentioned. Maybe Lester Holt wasn't so nice to him, but he could have pivoted off of every question.

Krauthammer Says Trump Screwed Up By Admitting He Never Paid Any Taxes
September 30, 2016 - 7:00am

Here is a partial transcript from Fox News Special Report Tuesday night:

CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Donald Trump couldn't resist the temptation to be the smart ass and to show that he's clever. Look, the pride he has is his success. That's how he defines himself, and he wasn't ashamed to admit that he could have done this.

He was actually conceding that he may not have paid any income tax. Now, in a boardroom with a bunch of other CEOs and you're boasting about your success, you say that. You don't say it in a presidential campaign.

Whereas Hillary said today, if it's smart not to pay any taxes and you're a billionaire, well what about the rest of us? And I think this thing could have legs, first concession that he may not have paid taxes.

And btw, Trump said it makes him smart, which is just laughable, because it makes his accountant smart, he does not do it, his accountant does it.

Another Real Debate Poll Has Clinton Crushing Trump 52 To 21
September 29, 2016 - 10:00am

A new NBC News/Survey Monkey poll of debate viewers found that Hillary Clinton defeated Donald Trump 52%-21%, but the big news is that Clinton improved her standing with Democratic voters.

Clinton boosted her image among her own party as a result of her performance -- 50 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaners said their opinion of her changed for the better as a result of Monday night's debate.

Trump, on the other hand did not have quite the same effect on his own party.

Only about 26 percent of likely Republican and Republican-leaning voters said their opinion of him changed for the better as a result of Monday's debate. A large majority -- 68 percent -- said their opinion of him did not change.

Hillary Clinton did exactly what she needed to do at the debate. She needed to bring Democrats home, and it looks like that is what she has done. Clinton has much more upside than Trump as a candidate. She could potentially get into the lower 50s in the popular vote, while Trump has not had a national poll show him with more than 45% support.

Donald Trump is defined. He is not going to sway Republicans or Republican leaners who have not decided to support him yet. Trump didn't help himself at the debate. Hillary Clinton not only won the debate, but she helped herself with voters within the Democratic Party.

Fox Hosts Sell Trump Lie Even After Memo Slams Rigged Polls
September 29, 2016 - 9:00am

After Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump spent Tuesday crowing about winning the debate via online polls and Fox News tried very hard to look the other way about the dubious source, a Fox News executive put her foot down in a memo obtained by Business Insider.

The memo, issued Tuesday afternoon, reminded producers that unscientific online polls don't meet their editorial standards.

Dana Blanton, Vice President of public opinion research at Fox News, explained what everyone in politics already knows in the memo, and that is that online polls like the one on Drudge, Time, etc. where people can opt-in or self-select are really just for fun.

Blanton then went through the obvious reasons why online polls aren't scientific just on their own. Furthering the issue with citing these polls is the fact that these polls had been gamed by a giant ring of Trump supporters.

Of course, knowing they weren't real didn't stop Fox hosts from citing the rigged polls showing that Donald Trump had won.

Fox News continued to pretend Trump won Tuesday evening, after the memo was sent out, and Wednesday morning Fox and Friends was busy selling the scam even after it was revealed that the already unscientific polls were rigged by his supporters.

Business Insider noted that Fox News host Sean Hannity cited the rigged polls Tuesday evening, after the memo was sent. Hannity used the polls to once again suggest that the sky isn't blue and Trump supporters shouldn't trust people who suggest that it is, "You've got this list of polls, Donald Trump wins. You watch TV, Hillary Clinton wins."

They also noted that Brian Kilmeade touted the online polls during an interview with a Trump official Wednesday morning. "The online polls show you guys won in overwhelming margins," the Fox and Friends co- host said to the official.

Donald Trump then used that garbage to further sell the lie by thanking Kilmeade on Twitter for mentioning his win. This is what Donald Trump and Fox News do – it's a false story propped up with lies and moving the goal posts.

Additionally, Fox News published a story citing the unscientific polls from places like Drudge, which is basically a Trump campaign publicity office.

However, at least in the published version Fox News told readers at the end, "The online surveys are not scientific and, in many cases, supporters of either candidate can cast multiple ballots." So they are basically worthless.

In reality, Hillary Clinton dealt a devastating blow to Donald Trump for the entire duration of Monday night's debate. Not only did everyone, including Republican strategists, admit that it was a win for Clinton with many calling it a blowout, but a real poll done by CNN confirmed the huge Clinton victory.

There is no way that any unbiased human being could have watched that debate and came away thinking Donald Trump won.

He spent the evening on defense, jumped around like a spoiled 10 year old child who had eaten too much sugar, interrupted Clinton during her time, bragged about not paying taxes, and tried to bully her and ended up looking like a fool when she coolly breezed past his insults and lies – at one moment he blamed her for pretty much every even of the last 30 years and she said by the end of the night everything would be her fault, to which Trump responded, "Why not?"

The first presidential debate wasn't a good night for Donald Trump. It was, in fact, a brutal night for Trump and a triumphant masterpiece of commanding the room by Hillary Clinton.

Trump and Fox are busy continuing this lie because that is what they do. They are selling a scam of a man, and so naturally the process of selling him will involve deceit and sleight of hand.

The results of denying reality and insisting upon a total fabrication being real can't be stated strongly enough. This is the work of a master abuser and thug, a con artist with bad intentions. We all knew Fox News wasn't news, and Donald Trump is intent on proving just how much of a publicity arm for the GOP the cable station really is.

Fineman: Trump's Debate Performance Was The Worst Ever
September 29, 2016 - 8:00am

Howard Finaman wrote this about the 1st debate:

I've been traveling to presidential debates since 1988, and the one I just saw here at Hofstra University was historic.

Republican nominee Donald Trump turned in the worst -- and I mean worst -- debate performance in modern times. It was so bad that in a normal year, it would disqualify him from getting anywhere near the White House.

But this is 2016, a year so weird, unsettled and unsettling, that even the spectacle of an unprepared and almost incoherent Trump, reeling from blow after blow from Democrat Hillary Clinton, may not be enough to slow him down.

The electorate is divided and dug in, and the nominees are the most disliked since polling began. Even Monday's televised mismatch may not move the numbers much. One snap poll, from PPP, showed Clinton the winner, 51 percent to 40 percent.

Nor is it clear that the traditional rules and pageants of electoral politics carry as much weight as they used to, especially in an era when voters are enveloped by the self-reinforcing digital news environment of their choice.

Trump landed three good blows -- on the NAFTA trade deals, the mess in the Middle East and Hillary's history of bad, bad experience in public life. But in the main, he could not deal with Clinton's well-prepared plan to attack him on every front.

As Clinton gained confidence, she flatly called Trump a racist and a sexist -- the latter with a vehemence she had clearly stored up for months. Some might have thought she overplayed her hand, but by the end of the debate Trump was hardly a sympathetic character.

With NBC moderator Lester Holt becoming more aggressive at the end after losing control of things early, the debate was for the most part an exercise in exposing Trump's lack of knowledge and casual approach to the biggest moment of the campaign.

Trump had lame if not confusing and contradictory answers on a whole host of issues, including but not limited to: why he hadn't released his income tax returns; the prospects and predicament of African Americans; his early business history as the son of wealth; whether he would benefit from the tax cuts he is proposing; and the role of Russia in hacking Americans.

After Holt bored in on Trump's documented early support for the war in Iraq, the billionaire businessman was reduced to pleading with reporters to ask Sean Hannity of Fox News about supposed private conversations the two had had before the war started.

Sensing that he was losing the moment -- big time -- Trump began to blame the mainstream media for opposing him and siding with Clinton.

In one surpassingly bizarre exchange, he suggested that perhaps the hacker probing U.S. computer systems might be somebody on a bed who weighs 400 pounds. Clinton could only smile.

However, she went after Trump with all the skill of the Yale-trained lawyer she is, and did so for the most part with a wry tone that was more that of a mom talking to a 7-year-old than the public scold she is often criticized for being.

She said that she was proud that she had prepared hard for the debate -- and that to have done so was a sign of how well prepared she would be for the presidency. That preparation including a successful effort to get under Trump's skin, first by calling him Donald and then, in one particularly effective recitation, by listing reasons why Trump might not want to release his income tax returns.

Trump was left to suggest that he might release a list of banks that have extended him loans, in an effort to show that he was extremely underleveraged.

Some of Clinton's prepared lines and attacks were stale and ineffective. Calling Trump's tax plan Trumped Up, Trickle Down didn't work. She prospered more by letting Trump turn on his own spit, which he did repeatedly.

Trump also found himself agreeing with Clinton several times, like a boxer holding himself up by clutching his foe. He said that he agreed with her on the need for more generous family child care; on banning the sale of weapons to those on no fly lists; and on the need to do more to prevent cyberattacks.

As the debate neared its end, Holt asked Trump about his comment that Clinton did not look presidential. The New York businessman said that he had meant her stamina, not her looks.

Clinton defended her staying power by reciting her extensive travels as secretary of state and her 11 hours of testimony before a congressional hearing.

And then Clinton unloaded, saying that Trump called women pigs, slobs and dogs and berated a beauty pageant contestant for gaining weight.

For what it's worth, the consensus in the press room was that Trump had been had.

And the debate reminded me of nothing so much as one of the first I covered, in Omaha, Nebraska, in 1988, when Democratic vice presidential candidate Lloyd Bentsen destroyed GOP candidate Dan Quayle with one line after the latter compared himself to President John F. Kennedy. "I knew Jack Kennedy," Bentsen said, "and you are no Jack Kennedy."

The debate was over that instant.

The effect on Monday was cumulative. If words matter and the rational reigns in American politics, then this would be a heavy blow to Trump's chances. We'll see if it is. In the meantime, let's not forget that Quayle ended up being vice president.

Leaked Fox Memo Says Online Polls Do Not Meet Their Editorial Standards
September 29, 2016 - 11:00am

Notice that Wednesday night O'Reilly never said one word about the leaked Fox News memo telling everyone to stop using the worthless online polls. He also never said a word about Trump using the polls, or the dishonest people at Fox using them. So much for O'Reilly being an honest non-partisan journalist.

O'Reilly and all the other Fox News Hosts are citing the worthless polls anyway. Proving they are all in the tank for Trump, and that they can not be trusted to report the news in an unbiased way.

The Fox News vice president for public-opinion research sent an internal memo out reminding television producers and the politics team that unscientific online polls "do not meet our editorial standards."

After the September 26 presidential debate, Fox News hosts and contributors repeatedly cited online polls, which largely favored Republican nominee Donald Trump, to defend Trump's widely panned performance.

Fox & Friends continued to hype online polls on September 28, the day after the internal Fox memo was sent, with co-host Brian Kilmeade stating that "the online polls show Trump winning an overwhelming margin."

In fact, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton dominated in the actual scientific polls.

The September 27 memo, sent by Dana Blanton, Fox News vice president of public-opinion research, noted that "quick vote items posted on the web are nonsense, not true measures of public opinion."

Blanton wrote that "the sample obviously can't be representative of the electorate because they only reflect the views of those Internet users who have chosen to participate."

From the September 28 Business Insider article:

A Fox News executive sent a memo Tuesday afternoon reminding television producers and the politics team that unscientific online polls "do not meet our editorial standards."

Dana Blanton, the vice president of public-opinion research at Fox News, explained in the memo obtained by Business Insider that "online 'polls' like the one on Drudge, Time, etc. where people can opt-in or self-select, are really just for fun."

"As most of the publications themselves clearly state, the sample obviously can't be representative of the electorate because they only reflect the views of those Internet users who have chosen to participate," Blanton wrote.

As the Fox News executive pointed out, users who participate in such polls must have internet access, be online at the time of the poll, be fans of the website in question, and self-select to participate.

"Another problem -- we know some campaigns/groups of supporters encourage people to vote in online polls and flood the voting page," she wrote.

"These quickie click items do not meet our editorial standards."

At least three Fox News hosts cited unscientific online polls in the hours following Monday's presidential debate to suggest Donald Trump emerged as the winner of the political showdown.

While Trump did, in fact, come out ahead in a slew of online polls, the polls were all unscientific, meaning the sample of participants did not accurately reflect the sample of viewers who watched the debate. Such polls are always discounted by professional pollsters and analysts.

The only scientific survey conducted in the immediate aftermath was the CNN/ORC instant poll, which showed viewers thought Hillary Clinton handily defeated Trump.

And the Republican pollster Frank Luntz had a focus group that voted 17 to 3 for Clinton as the winner, so it was not just the CNN poll that had Clinton easily winning, which was 18 to 2 for Clinton, almost matching the Luntz focus group vote exactly.

Respondents to a Morning Consult poll released Wednesday also said, by a 49% to 26% margin, that Clinton bested Trump in the debate.

"News networks and other organizations go to great effort and rigor to conduct scientific polls -- for good reason," Blanton wrote in the memo. "They know quick vote items posted on the web are nonsense, not true measures of public opinion."

O'Reilly did it too, saying this Tuesday night on his show:

O'REILLY: "Finally, Bret Baier had a wise comment today. He said that if the polls continue to build for Trump after the debate, the Clinton campaign will be in serious trouble. Many online surveys are boosting Trump's debate performance, but both candidates can do much better. And to win the White House they will have to."

There were no polls that continued to build for Trump, they were all rigged and worthless online polls that nobody goes by.

And btw folks, I have known for 20 years that these online polls are a joke, I used to run polls on my website and every one came out 80/20 against O'Reilly, because the site is, so most of my visitors hate O'Reilly, and all my polls were rigged by my visitors, so I stopped doing them a long time ago.

That means O'Reilly and the people at Fox have also known for many years that those online polls are worthless, and yet they all cited them as valid polls anyway, just to try to make Trump look good somehow, proving they are all biased for Trump, and can not be trusted.

O'Reilly even tried to get Charles Krauthammer to promote the online polls, but it backfired, because Krauthammer slammed them, saying this:

KRAUTHAMMER: "Snap polls are totally meaningless, and they tell you nothing. I guarantee you that if you had a poll on who had the better hair, Trump would get the same 80%.

The Valid & Scientific Polls On The Debate Are In & Clinton Won
September 29, 2016 - 10:00am

Hillary Clinton scored a decisive debate victory over Donald Trump, coming off as more presidential and better prepared, according to a new HuffPost/YouGov poll.

Donald Trump was viewed as ill-prepared.

By a 27-point margin, 49 percent to 22 percent, Americans who had heard at least something about Monday's presidential debate said that Clinton did a better job than Trump.

Those results are mostly in line with other scientific post-debate polls, which also found a sizable advantage for Clinton.

Seventy-seven percent of those polled, including a majority in both parties, said that Clinton prepared well enough for the debate, compared to just 27 percent who said the same for Trump.

Even 43 percent of Republicans said that Trump should have done more preparation.

A majority, 56 percent, said that Clinton displayed a presidential temperament during the debate. Just 34 percent said the same of Trump, who claimed during the debate that his temperament was his strongest asset.

Clinton led on laying out her positions, with 50 percent of those polled saying she did a better job of explaining her policies, 28 percent naming Trump, and 22 percent unsure.

Two-thirds of Americans polled said they had watched at least part of the debate, while 10 percent had watched only clips or highlights, and 11 percent had only read or watched news stories about it.

The opinions of those in the latter groups matter because, as research has found, coverage of a debate can have just as much impact as the debate itself, and because even those who didn't tune in may still turn out to vote.

And there's generally a perception that coverage was friendlier toward Clinton. Sixty-six percent said that Clinton received more positive news coverage after the debate, while just 6 percent believed that Trump had.

Clinton got more positive news coverage because she did very well, and Trump did terrible, so that is what the reporting is going to report on.

Those who watched at least part of the debate said by a 30-point margin, 53 percent to 23 percent, that Clinton won, while those who watched highlights or read news stories said so by a narrower 17-point margin, 35 percent to 18 percent.

While Democrats who paid attention to the debate saw it as a win for Clinton, Republicans were less enthusiastic about Trump's performance. Eighty-two percent of Democrats polled said that Clinton won, and similar percentages gave her high marks for preparation, temperament, truthfulness and policy chops.

In contrast, just 43 percent of Republicans polled said that Trump did better, with 17 percent believing that Clinton outperformed him, and 35 percent that neither candidate won the debate. A fifth said that the debate worsened their opinion of the Republican nominee.

Independents who were polled also favored Clinton, saying by a 14-point margin, 39 percent to 25 percent, that she won the debate over Trump. Forty-four percent felt she displayed a presidential temperament, while just 35 percent said the same of Trump.

The Biased Trump Supporter O'Reilly Admitted Clinton Won The Debate
September 29, 2016 - 9:00am

O'Reilly: "She Used Three Effective Grenades. Trump's Tax Returns, The Birther Issue, And Support For The Iraq War"

Quote from O'Reilly Tuesday night:

BILL O'REILLY (HOST): Technically, Hillary Clinton won the debate on points because she was able to keep Trump on the defensive. She used three effective grenades. His tax returns, the birther issue, and support for the Iraq War.

Even Krauthammer Admits The Online Polls Showing Trump Won Are Meaningless
September 29, 2016 - 8:00am

Here is a partial transcript from the O'Reilly Factor Tuesday night:

BILL O'REILLY (HOST): Now, before we get to the specifics of the debate with you. Were you surprised that the Time magazine snap poll and WCBSTV snap poll, which is a CBS flag ship here in New York, had Trump winning fairly substantially?

CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Of course not. Because they are totally meaningless. These are online polls. These are not random samples. The only thing that means anything and even the randomly sampled polls have their problems.

But the idea that you win because your supporters come out and click on the computer more than others tells you nothing. I guarantee you that if you had a poll on who had the better hair, Trump would get the same 80 percent.


Take Note: O'Reilly knows the online polls were rigged by right-wingers at online forums and message boards posting links to the polls and telling all their members to flood and rig the vote, and yet he reports their results as if they are valid, and points out that Trump won them, when he knows they are unscientific and worthless.

Trump Lied On O'Reilly That He Won The Google Poll
September 29, 2016 - 7:00am

On the Wednesday night O'Reilly Factor show, Donald Trump said he did well in the debate and that he won a bunch of polls, and even the google poll. Even though most of the polls he was talking about were the worthless online polls even O'Reilly now admits are garbage.

It was the 1st segment on the show and Trump said he won the Google poll by 2 or 3 points, which is just a flat out 100% lie, and O'Reilly said nothing.

Not once did O'Reilly fact check Trump and tell him he was wrong, he just let him lie.

I am looking at the Google debate poll right now and it says this:

Exclusive IJR-Google Poll Shows the Victory in Last Night's Presidential Debate Goes to...Hillary Clinton

In a poll conducted for Independent Journal Review by Google Consumer Surveys, respondents were asked the following questions.

Who won the debate? Hillary, by four points, 52 to 48.

So Trump lied, he lost by four points, in the very same Google poll he claims to have won by 2 or 3 points. And you know he was lying because he could not even cite one number, was it by 2 points, or 3 points? If he really won and he was not lying he would have had an exact number, instead of saying he won by 2 or 3 points.

And one last thing, in the O'Reilly transcript of the segment on his very own website he edited out the part where Trump said he won the Google poll by 2 or 3 points, it is not in the transcript, but when you watch the video you can clearly hear Trump say he won the Google poll by 2 or 3 points. You can bet it was edited out because O'Reilly knows it is a lie.

O'Reilly Lied For Trump That He Opposed The Iraq War
September 28, 2016 - 9:00am

O'Reilly lied that Trump opposed the Iraq war, and then said nobody cares if he opposed it or not. So he lied for Trump, then claimed it is ok to lie about it because he says nobody cares. But when Hillary Clinton lied about something nobody cared about O'Reilly did not have the same opinion, in her case it was important, but when Trump does it he says it is not important.

O'Reilly and almost everyone at Fox News Has Tried Defending Trump's Iraq War Lie, Despite All Evidence To The Contrary. They just ignore the actual audio tape of Trump on the Howard Stern show (from before the Iraq War) where he says he supports the war, O'Reilly and Fox refuse to play it, while spinning for Trump that he opposed the war.

Here is a partial transcript of O'Reilly lying and spinning for Trump:

BILL O'REILLY (HOST): Is it possible that no one cares about whether Donald Trump thought the Iraq War, the run-up -- I don't care. I mean, I don't know why anybody would care at this juncture in history. So what?

FRANK LUNTZ: You're correct. And that's because we want to know what they're going to do in the future. Not what they have done in the past and not what they thought in the past.

O'REILLY: Look, I can then report this. I know Trump. Trump didn't like that war. He didn't like it. So I can tell you, that's firsthand experience.

Do Not Trust Online Polls Because They Can Be Rigged
September 28, 2016 - 8:00am

I have seen this done myself, online groups of Republicans post links to online polls then have everyone on their list and in their group to flood the polls. They do it all the time at the right-wing, and even brag about how good they rigged the polls.

They vote multiple times using tricks and scripts, and sometimes even run programs that do multiple votes.

Those online polls that Trump keeps tweeting as proof of his victory at the presidential debate were rigged by rings of Trump supporters who manipulated the polling.

According to The Daily Dot, the reason why Trump won the online polling but lost every other poll was that a large ring of Trump supporters rigged the vote:

In this latest incarnation, multiple Reddit users enlisted the Trump-supporting masses on r/The_Donald, which has over 200,000 subscribers, by posting dozens of online polls that are vulnerable to vote brigading, bots, and other forms of manipulation that make these non-scientific surveys notoriously unreliable.

The goal, according to comments surrounding the poll-manipulation threads, is to twist the mainstream media narrative that crowned Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton the victor. The effort spread to Twitter, where #TrumpWon became the number one trending topic in the United States Tuesday morning.

Trump supporters were flooding the online polls in a coordinated effort to make the press and voters think that they really didn't see Donald J. Trump fall flat on his face while attempting to debate Hillary Clinton. The fix was in, which is why no credible news outlet reports on, or trusts online polls.

Fox News has been pushing Trump's victory in the rigged online polls, which says more about Fox than it does the organizations who choose to place unscientific polls on their websites.

Any poll that is open to the public can be easily manipulated, and should not be trusted as a valid source of information.

Even the rigging of the online polls can't hide the fact that Donald Trump lost the first presidential debate.

And btw, Trump and all his people know those online polls were rigged, and yet he cited tham anyway, which is a very dishonest thing to do. The online polls are unscientific and basically worthless, because the only people who vote in them choose to visit that website and the results can easily be rigged.

Trump Flies Personal Jet For Campaign And You Are Paying Millions For It
September 28, 2016 - 7:00am

Taxpayers are now picking up most of Donald Trump's air travel costs, unnecessarily spending millions of dollars because he insists on flying aboard his luxury 757 instead of a more practical plane.

And because the GOP presidential nominee owns both the company that owns the jetliner and the one that operates it, some percentage of that taxpayer money is winding up as profit in Trump's personal bank account.

Because it seats so few passengers, Trump's Secret Service agents make up more than half of the plane's flight manifests. And that means taxpayers are now legally required to pick up the majority of its staggering running costs.

Over the first three months of this year, after Trump asked for and received Secret Service protection, the agency's payments to his campaign accounted for 48 percent of the $1.7 million that it paid Tag Air Inc., the candidate's company that operates the private jet.

Over June, July and August, as Trump became the GOP nominee and his security detail grew, the agency's payments to the campaign made up 78 percent of the $1.3 million that it paid to Tag Air, according to The Huffington Post's review of Federal Election Commission filings.

Politico, which first reported these payments, put the total the Secret Service paid to the Trump campaign at $1.6 million. But a closer look at campaign finance filings shows that the U.S. Secret Service covered more than $2.3 million of the $3.8 million Trump’s campaign has paid Tag Air in 2016.

That figure is on pace to top $3 million by Election Day on Nov. 8 -- a total that would be nearly double what taxpayers spent to fly Secret Service agents around with 2012 GOP nominee Mitt Romney.

The difference: Romney did what every other non-incumbent presidential candidate has done in recent history and chartered an airliner on which staff, Secret Service and the traveling press corps all flew together, thereby driving down the cost for everyone.

"It's eye-opening," said Bob Biersack, who spent three decades at the FEC before joining the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

Biersack said the payments do not appear to be illegal and that the former reality TV show host was not likely to care about appearances. He pointed to the many tax breaks Trump's businesses have aggressively sought over the years. "This is not the first time he's used government assets to his own advantage, right?" he added.

Both the Secret Service and the FEC said election regulations do not allow any leeway for how the agency is to reimburse campaigns for travel. Trump's campaign did not respond to queries from HuffPost about the matter.

The last Republican candidate did the same thing in the final months of 2012. Romney's chartered McDonnell-Douglas MD-83 was only seven feet shorter than Trump's Boeing 757, but was configured essentially like a standard airliner and could carry some 150 passengers, even with a more spacious first-class section for Romney and his top staff.

In contrast, Trump's 757, which he purchased from Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen in 2011, boasts a lounge with a 57-inch television and home theater sound, a master bedroom appointed with silk wall coverings and a guest room with a mohair couch that converts to a bed. It can, however, only seat 43 people and it appears not to carry even that many on the campaign trail, based on the number aboard recent flights.

FEC rules require that Secret Service agents pay a "pro-rata share of the travel" to the campaign. So if agents on any given leg make up three quarters of the passengers, the U.S. Government is required to pay three quarters of the cost to fly Trump's luxury jet.

What that figure is precisely for a given amount of time is known by the Trump campaign, but cannot be determined through the few public documents on file that describe Tag Air.

And as pricey as his plane is to fly, he makes his travel even more expensive by insisting on returning to New York City at the end of each day so he can sleep in his own bed in Trump Tower's penthouse. Flying home, rather than overnighting in the next city on the campaign schedule, typically adds three to four hours of flying time per day, translating to $27,000 to $36,000 per day in higher flight costs.

Trump paid Tag Air $2.1 million to fly his plane around to campaign events in 2015. The money came from the checks he was writing to fund his campaign, as well as from the sale of "Make America Great Again" hats and other campaign souvenirs. Not a dime came from taxpayers.

This year has been a completely different story, first with the availability of Secret Service payments to defray his travel costs, and then with a flood of donor money following his signing of a joint fundraising deal with the Republican National Committee in May.

The Secret Service payments to fly on Trump's glitzy but inefficient plane hit taxpayers, potentially creating problems for him if public anger translates into a drop in support, the Center for Responsive Politics Biersack said.

"The issue is that he's chosen that particular plane," Biersack said, adding that FEC commissioners likely never contemplated that a candidate would choose such an extravagant mode of transportation. Nor did anyone guess that taxpayers could wind up on the hook if it did happen, Biersack added.

"It was never anticipated that the proportion of campaign travelers would be so heavily tilted toward federal officials."

In other words, Trump keeps the passenger list down so that taxpayers are paying most of the bill, which should be illegal, and he should have to pay it himself, or use a different plane.

James Carville Says Trump Debate Performance Was Terrible
September 27, 2016 - 11:00am

Carville: "Trump's Debate Performance Was So Bad, Roger Ailes Will Have To Disavow Involvement"

Carville: "I Just Bet You That The Word Comes Out From Roger, 'I Didn't Have Anything To Do With This, Don't Pin This On Me'"

Partial transcript:

BRIAN WILLIAMS: While we're having a moment, James Carville would like in. James, critique the job you just heard Kellyanne Conway doing, up against withering questioning from Chris Matthews.

JAMES CARVILLE: Well, look, I thought I was back watching Crossfire when I was on that. I mean look, she talked a lot and she has a difficult job. One point I wanted to make is so much of the Trump persona and so much of what he talks about is winning, and how he's a winner, and everybody's a loser.

And I think a lot of his supporters like -- take pride in the fact that he's such a winner, and he was anything but that tonight. And I wonder what the effect of this is going to be on the enthusiasm of his supporters, that he actually -- and he got beat by Hillary Clinton who to a lot of his people is evil incarnate, or is a weak person or something like that.

So, I -- this is kind of a unique thing where somebody whose whole branding is built around being a winner and he can win for the country really did -- lost so bad tonight. It's going to be curious to see how he carries that through.

And Nicole, I bet you tomorrow that Roger Ailes gets out that he didn't have very much to do with preparation. I just bet you that the word comes out from Roger, "I didn't have anything to do with this, don't pin this on me."

But the crazy far-right fool Sean Hannity loved it, and even said Trump had a good night, which is just laughable. Losing all the polls and focus groups 18 to 2 and 17 to 3 is not having a good night, except is Hannityland, where Trump always has a good night, even when he does terrible and shows what a dummy he is.

Partial transcript:

SEAN HANNITY: Hey welcome to this two hour edition of Hannity. We're live from Hofstra University. We're in Hempstead, New York. The first presidential debate is now in the books. A very good night for Donald Trump.

Tonight, we'll speak with the man himself, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, Kellyanne Conway, Rudy Giuliani, Reince Priebus, Newt Gingrich, Laura Ingraham, Sherriff David Clarke, and so many more but first, right after the debate after he stepped off the stage I had the very first interview with the Republican nominee.

Trump Lies That Lester Holt Is A Democrat
September 27, 2016 - 10:00am

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump sees Democrats everywhere. Even when they're not.

Take his friendly chat Monday night with Fox's Bill O'Reilly, who asked Trump about the scheduled moderators of his debates with Hillary Clinton. If you missed it, here's a portion of the transcript courtesy of The Washington Post when they talked about the journalists who will be asking the questions, including Lester Holt of NBC:

TRUMP: And by the way, Lester is a Democrat.

O'REILLY: I didn't know that.

TRUMP: Look, it's a phony system. Lester is a Democrat. I mean, they are all Democrats. Okay? It's a very unfair system.

In fact, Holt has been a registered Republican since 2003.

Fox News On Suicide Watch After Clinton Crushed Trump At Debate
September 27, 2016 - 9:00am

Fox News is nearly suicidal after Donald Trump was routed by Hillary Clinton in the first presidential debate.

Brit Hume immediately criticized Trump for his facial expressions saying that Trump looked annoyed. Bret Baier, Megyn Kelly, and Juan Williams moaned and groaned that Trump only briefly talked about Clinton's emails.

Kelly said, "There was a lot of time that he was given to exploit the issue, which was a major issue in the campaign, and it went unused."

The Fox coverage then cut to Sean Hannity backstage with Trump for some post-debate propaganda.

After Trump and Hannity had cuddled for a bit, the coverage went back to Baier and Kelly. Megyn Kelly pointed out that Clinton sliced and diced Trump. Even Fox News noticed that Clinton was on the offensive during the debate while Trump played defense.

The mood of the coverage at Fox News is completely glum and dire, which is the biggest sign yet that Republicans know that Donald Trump did poorly in the first presidential debate.

Debate Moderator Asks Trump To Justify Not Releasing His Tax Returns
September 27, 2016 - 8:00am

Partial transcript:

LESTER HOLT (MODERATOR): Mr. Trump, we're talking about the burden that Americans have to pay, yet you have not released your tax returns. And the reason nominees have released their returns for decades is so that voters will know if their potential president owes money to, who he owes it to, and any business conflicts.

Don't Americans have a right to know if there are any conflicts of interest?

DONALD TRUMP: I don't mind releasing. I'm under a routine audit, and it will be released, and as soon as the audit is finished, it will be released.

HOLT: The IRS says an audit of your taxes -- you're perfectly free to release your taxes during an audit. And so the question, does the public's right to know outweigh your personal --

TRUMP: Well, I told you, I will release them as soon as the audit. Look, I've been under audit almost for 15 years.

CNN's Post-Debate Poll Shows An Overwhelming Victory For Hillary Clinton
September 27, 2016 - 7:00am

CNN Post-Debate Poll Shows 62 Percent Of Audience Thought Clinton Won, Just 27 Percent Thought Trump Won.

Partial transcript:

WOLF BLITZER (CO-HOST): You've got the results of our poll that was taken in the aftermath of this debate.

DAVID CHALIAN: I do, it is a poll of debate watchers, and so in our sample, this is a more Clinton-friendly audience.

We now will reveal to you who won the debate according to this audience. Overwhelmingly Hillary Clinton. Sixty-two percent of Americans, of those that watched the debate tonight in this audience said Hillary Clinton won compared to 27 percent who said Trump won.

Again, this is of debate watchers and our sample definitely is more Democratic than a normal poll. But that is an overwhelming victory among these debate watchers we polled for Hillary Clinton.

Yes CNN had it 18 to 2 for Clinton, but the right-leaning Frank Luntz focus group also has Clinton killing Trump, 17 to 3, so it was not just Clinton leaning watchers who thought she crushed Trump in the debate.

Frank Luntz tweeted this:

So far, 17 people in my group say Hillary is winning; 3 say Trump. Tax question weakened him, birther question destroyed him.

Fact checkers also counted 16 lies from Trump, and 0 for Clinton. Let's see O'Reilly and Fox spin that, you know they will, just how much?

Donald Trump Was Sued Many Times For Disability Law Violations
September 26, 2016 - 8:00am

Here is the real Donald Trump, it shows he does not care about disabled people, even disabled veterans. All he cares about is making money.

At least eight times over the last 19 years, Donald Trump's properties have been subject to lawsuits for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act, court records show. Additionally, a federal inspection found current ADA violations at one of his properties.

Only once did Trump come close to winning, in a suit that was dismissed at the request of both sides. Five of the cases were settled, while two ended in consent decrees requiring building modifications and one met its end in a Trump property bankruptcy.

When a disabled Purple Heart veteran filed a lawsuit in 2004 alleging that the Trump International Hotel and Tower in New York lacked proper handicapped-accessible emergency exits, guest rooms and restrooms, Trump dragged the case out for three years.

He tried to get the lawsuit dismissed and counter-sued his own architects to try and shift liability to them, but a judge dismissed that attempt. Trump eventually settled and agreed to make changes to the hotel.

"What was so striking and frankly appalling was the way he tried to fight the violations," said Helena Berger, the president and CEO of the nonprofit American Association of People with Disabilities. "That, I think, is really telling."

After Trump mocked a New York Times reporter with arthrogryposis last November, the reality TV star defended himself by pointing out how much money he had spent on accessibility in his hotels. "I spend millions a year, or millions of dollars on ramps," he said in July, "and get rid of the stairs and different kinds of elevators all over and I'm gonna mock? I would never do that."

He did it, it is on video, Trump mocked a disabled reporter and made fun of his disability, he just refuses to admit it. Just like O'Reilly does when he says something crazy, he refuses to admit it and slams the person who simply reported what he said.

Yeah Trump spends the money, but only when he has to, and after years of legal battles over it, which he never tells you about, or O'Reilly for that matter. O'Reilly never reports any of this stuff, he ignores it all, but if Clinton even stubs her toe O'Reilly is all over that story.

Spending that money is a legal requirement: The Americans with Disabilities Act, which became law in 1990, requires that buildings and spaces used by the public meet specific disability access standards.

The cases show that Trump has been less than enthusiastic about spending money to bring his buildings into compliance with federal law.

For example, in 2001, two wheelchair users said that the wheelchair lift at Trump International was kept locked, and the employee who eventually unlocked it couldn't operate it. In court records, one of the plaintiffs, Robert Levine, said the experience made him feel like a second class citizen. The other plaintiff, Frieda Zames, said it was like being a grade school child asking permission to go to the restroom.

As in the 2004 lawsuit, after a judge denied Trump's motion to dismiss the case, Trump counter-sued his architect to try to shift liability. Trump amicably settled the 2001 case in 2009, when both he and the plaintiffs agreed to dismiss the complaint.

Emily Munson, a disability rights lawyer, told HuffPost that she understands the building owner's perspective in ADA cases. The requirements are exhaustive and violations can be very technical, compared to more substantive problems, Munson said. On the other hand, she added, businesses have had over a quarter century to come into compliance with the ADA.

Trump, she said, "clearly sees people with disabilities as sick or in need of charity and pity, rather than people with rights who deserve to be out and about and accessing the community."

Trump's Atlantic City Plaza Hotel has also come under fire for its basic and serious deficiencies in accessibility. In a 1997 suit, James Conlon, who is paraplegic, said that even though he stayed in a designated handicapped-accessible room at the hotel, the toilets and showers were unusable for someone in a wheelchair, and the public restrooms were so inaccessible that he had to ask strangers to help him use them.

Trump settled the case a year later, agreeing to pay Conlon's legal fees and renovate the hotels rooms and public restrooms to comply with federal law. But a year after that, Conlon told the judge in the case that the renovations Trump had agreed to hadn't been done.

Two additional complaints were brought against the Plaza Hotel in 2007 and 2008. The plaintiffs in the former agreed to dismiss the case, and the latter case was terminated by Trump's company's 2009 bankruptcy.

Conlon also brought a case in 2003 alleging that the bus between New York and the Atlantic City, New Jersey, casino wasn't accessible and that wheelchair access could only be provided with one week's notice. Trump tried counter-suing the bus provider, but eventually settled Conlon's case.

Another Trump hotel in Atlantic City, the Trump Taj Mahal, settled with the Department of Justice in 2011 after an inspection by the U.S. Attorney's Office showed numerous violations, including not posting signs on some disabled parking spots.

But the cases aren't limited to Trump's tri-state area properties. In 2011, a guest at the Trump International Miami -- which the reality star doesn't own but licenses his name to -- alleged that his designated accessible room had accessibility problems. The case was confidentially settled.

And in response to a lawsuit in 2014, the Trump National Doral Miami golf course said making its pool accessible to disabled users would impose an undue burden. Trump and the plaintiff agreed to enter into a consent decree four months after the suit was filed.

Study Finds 20 Million Americans Would Lose Healthcare Under Trump
September 26, 2016 - 7:00am

A non-partisan study revealed devastating news for the Republican Party and Donald Trump. The Trump healthcare plan would make health care more expensive and cost 19.7 million mostly poor, and ill Americans their health insurance.

The non-partisan study from the Rand Corporation funded by The Commonwealth Fund of Trump's health insurance plan found, "Repealing the ACA would result in 19.7 million fewer people with health insurance in 2018. This estimate assumes that individuals who newly enrolled in Medicaid under the ACA, but who were eligible under prior law, would remain enrolled even if the law were repealed."

"Repealing the ACA and adding a tax deduction for health insurance would result in 15.6 million fewer people with health insurance. The Medicaid block-grant program results in 25.1 million fewer people with health insurance, including approximately 5.5 million people who were eligible for Medicaid under pre-ACA rules who lose coverage because states may lack the funds to sustain enrollment among this population. Allowing insurers to sell across states lines reduces coverage by 17.5 million people."

In contrast, the same analysis of Hillary Clinton's plan would provide access to health insurance to additional 9.6 million people, and reduce the cost of health care by 39%.

Donald Trump's health care plan would make health care less accessible, more expensive, and would jeopardize the lives of tens of millions of sick and poor Americans.

The choice for voters regarding policy is simple. A vote for Donald Trump is a vote for going back to the old system of more expensive health insurance and denial of coverage. Trump is a step backward that would literally cost people their lives and at minimum reduce the quality of life of tens of millions of Americans.

If voters can through the media chatter and noise, and look at what Trump is proposing to do as president, the decision in this election will get more obvious.

Trump doesn't want attention focused on his policies, which is why the last thing he needed three days before the first presidential debate was to have his fraudulent health care plan exposed to the world.

Clinton Hits Key 50-Percent Mark Leads By 6 Points In New Poll
September 24, 2016 - 9:00am

Hillary Clinton has a healthy lead over Donald Trump with just days until the first presidential debate, according to a new poll released Thursday by Associated Press/Gfk.

Clinton: 50%
Trump: 44%

In a head-to-head matchup against Trump, the Democratic nominee hits the critical 50-percent mark and beats Trump by six points among likely voters. In a hypothetical contest that includes third-party candidates Gary Johnson and Jill Stein, Clinton maintains her six-point edge over Trump and beats him by a margin of 45 percent to 39 percent.

The survey is the latest sign that public opinion is beginning to shift back in Clinton's favor during a critical moment in the campaign.

With more and more national data, including another poll out Tuesday showing Clinton up five, it's clear that the momentum is in her favor.

State polling data also had good news for Clinton on Thursday, with the Democratic nominee ahead in polls from Wisconsin, Virginia, and Colorado. In states like Florida and North Carolina, must-wins for Trump, the two major candidates are locked in tight battles.

Fortunately for the Democratic nominee, state polling tends to lag behind national surveys, meaning her clear improvement nationally is likely to show up in swing-state polls in the near future. Her slight Electoral College lead could become more comfortable in the coming weeks.

As we inch closer to the first presidential debate and the key month of October, Clinton is likely feeling good about the current trajectory of the race.

Clinton Drops Bomb On Trump Releasing 19 Pages Of Fact Checked Lies
September 24, 2016 - 8:00am

The Clinton campaign held a special press call to call on the debate moderators, media, and voters to fact check Donald Trump. In order to help the press, debate moderators, and voters fact check Trump, the Clinton campaign has released 19 pages of Trump lies.

HFA Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri said, "Donald Trump has shown a clear pattern of repeating provably false lies hoping that nobody will correct him. As we head into this debate, we want voters and viewers to be on alert that they should keep track. Any candidate that tells this many lies, clearly can’t win the debate on the merits."

The release of so many pages of fact checked lies was a brilliantly clever move from the Clinton campaign.

Palmieri repeated the Clinton belief that the moderator should be fact checking Trump at the debate, but since it has been made clear that this isn't going to happen, Clinton is giving voters and the press all of the materials that they need to fact check Trump in real time at the debate.

Throughout his entire campaign, Trump has been allowed to lie without consequence, but that is about to change at the first presidential debate.

The Clinton campaign is ready, and they are mobilizing an army of fact checkers to take down Trump.

Trump Campaign Chair Resigns After Racist Anti-Obama Comment
September 23, 2016 - 10:00am

A Trump campaign coordinator, Kathy Miller, was forced to resign on Thursday after The Guardian published an interview in which she said racism was nonexistent "until Obama got elected."

It's the latest evidence that Donald Trump's phony minority outreach effort is failing miserably. Miller, chair of the Trump campaign in Ohio's Mahoning County, said this:

"I don't think there was any racism until Obama got elected. We never had problems like this. Now, with the people with the guns, and shooting up neighborhoods and not being responsible citizens, that's a big change, and I think that's the philosophy that Obama has perpetuated on America. And if you're black and you haven't been successful in the last 50 years, it's your own fault. When do they take responsibility for how they live?"

Her comments aren't just offensive - though pretty unsurprising given how many Trump supporters subscribe to this bigotry - but they are also firmly rooted in a version of reality that exists only in the minds of those who support the Republican nominee.

It's an alternate reality where the African-American community is, as Trump now says repeatedly, riddled with uneducated, violent, and impoverished people. It's a dystopian fantasy meant to appeal to people's worst instincts.

It's obvious that racism existed not just before Obama's presidency, but before he was even born. And it's certainly true that bigotry has often reared its ugly head during his two terms.

What this disgraced Trump official doesn't seem to understand, at least not publicly, is why bigotry and prejudice have surfaced under Obama. It's not because he has done anything blatantly racist. It's certainly not because he has incited racism or made offensive comments directed at white people.

Obama's attitude or governing style hasn't been motivated by a bias toward one race or another. Instead, it is the reaction by many, including Trump himself, to this president's existence that has made race such a relevant issue.

Questioning Obama's legitimacy, his patriotism, his birthplace, his religion - these racially motivated attacks are things that have, indeed, happened under this president. But is it people like Donald Trump and Kathy Miller who have perpetuated them.

And btw, Obama is not to blame for racism, the racists are to blame. Obama is just a black man who became the President, he has not made racism worse, and the people who say he has are just idiots. How is it the fault of Obama that he is black, and there are racist white people who hate him just because of his skin color.

It's crazy to say because a black man was elected President he has made racism worse, it's insane. The people to blame are the racists, not Obama.

Biased Bill O'Reilly Slams Washington Post For Criticizing Trump
September 23, 2016 - 9:00am

Here is a partial transcript from the Wednesday O'Reilly Factor:

BILL O'REILLY: The left in America dazed and confused by how tight the presidential race is just a few days before the first debate. The liberal media, in particular, in panic mode, so they're breaking out the evil card, Adolf Hitler.

Writing in the The Washington Post this week crazy-left columnist Richard Cohen banter's Trump "Hitlerian disregard for the truth." Basically, Cohen putting forth that Trump is like Hitler in his thinking because, quote, he thinks the truth is what he says it is, unquote. Interesting.

The Washington Post is interesting because hard news wise they do a pretty good job. But this guy, Fred Hiatt, who runs the editorial section and op-eds and all of that, this guy is so crazy because when you write a column, there has to be some kind of -- and you’re a columnist -- you have to have some kind of measure, you know?

You can't just be saying Donald Trump is Hitler when Hitler killed 55 million people because of his actions. You can't be doing that.

Trump Campaign Paid Trump's Companies Over $500,000 In August
September 23, 2016 - 8:00am

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump's campaign paid more than $500,000 in August to companies the businessman owns, according to campaign finance reports released late Tuesday.

The chief beneficiaries were Trump's aviation company and his office headquarters in Manhattan: TAG Air was paid nearly $320,000 for operating the campaign jet and Trump Tower collected nearly $170,000 in rent for the month of August.

Another $23,000 went to smaller Trump properties and businesses.

The biggest single recipient of Trump's campaign largesse last month was the digital marketing firm Giles-Parscale, which collected more than $11 million in fees from the Republican nominee. Brad Parscale, the company's president, has no formal political experience, but he's been a key member of Trump's resort marketing team for nearly a decade.

And who wants to bet me Trump is getting a kickback of some of that money for doing it? Anyone?

Trump also increased the amount of money his campaign shells out for private security, by nearly 10 times. The expense went from $20,000 in July to more than $180,000 in August.

As the presidential nominee of a major party, Trump already receives Secret Service protection. The Secret Service typically refunds political campaigns part of the cost of flying around with the candidate.

In June, police in Las Vegas arrested a 20-year-old Englishman who tried to grab an officer's gun, and who later said he intended to shoot Trump. A spokeswoman for the Trump campaign did not immediately respond to questions Wednesday about the former reality TV star's beefed-up security costs.

Luckily for Trump, his record-setting campaign expenditures were offset by a strong wave of small donations which totaled more than $12 million, many of which were made online. The strong fundraising followed a month during which Trump had replaced his core campaign team and worked hard to look more like a disciplined, mainstream presidential candidate.

Still, hundreds of thousands of dollars flow each month from the bank accounts of small dollar Trump donors and into the bank account of the self-proclaimed billionaire and "King of Debt."

The issue of how the presidential candidate spends the money donated to his Donald J. Trump Foundation has come to the fore this week, amid new allegations that he and his charity may have run afoul of basic tax laws.

Which of course O'Reilly has totally ignored.

The Washington Post revealed on Tuesday how Trump used money from his nonprofit foundation to settle a lawsuit against one of his private businesses. Rather than respond to the actual story, Trump and his campaign attacked the reporter, as did O'Reilly. He ignores the facts and slams the reporter who simply reported them.

He's like Trump's paid attack dog, he goes after anyone who reports bad news about Trump.

Crazy O'Reilly Says Voter ID Disenfranchisement Is A Total Myth
September 22, 2016 - 9:00am

Even though courts have shown it is true, with actual evidence, that O'Reilly ignores and never reports on, then acts like there is no evidence.

Here is a partial transcript from the Wednesday O'Reilly Factor, at least he had one guest on to call BS on his nonsense.

BILL O'REILLY (HOST): Okay. Let's go to the voter registration thing which is a total myth. Eboni. You have a situation that a little ID card which will be sent, delivered, handed to you with a bag of M&Ms is now saying that's oppressive, you can't ask for that when voting. How insane is this.

EBONI WILLIAMS: Well Bill, the Fourth Circuit and the United States Supreme Court, many of those members would disagree with you that's a myth. In fact, they think, with surgical precision, they said it targets disproportionately targets black people.

Trump Used $258,000 From His Charity To Settle Legal Problems
September 22, 2016 - 8:00am

Which is illegal, but O'Reilly never reported on it, and does not understand why anyone is investigating the Trump foundation. In O'Reillyworld Trump never does anything wrong or illegal, and he calls it bias if anyone in the media reports on it, while he ignores the truth and covers for Trump.

Donald Trump spent more than a quarter-million dollars from his charitable foundation to settle lawsuits that involved the billionaire's for-profit businesses, according to interviews and a review of legal documents.

Those cases, which together used $258,000 from Trump's charity, were among four newly documented expenditures in which Trump may have violated laws against self-dealing -- which prohibit nonprofit leaders from using charity money to benefit themselves or their businesses.

In one case, from 2007, Trump's Mar-a-Lago Club faced $120,000 in unpaid fines from the town of Palm Beach, Fla., resulting from a dispute over the size of a flagpole.

In a settlement, Palm Beach agreed to waive those fines -- if Trump's club made a $100,000 donation to a specific charity for veterans. Instead, Trump sent a check from the Donald J. Trump Foundation, a charity funded almost entirely by other people's money, according to tax records.

Sean Hannity In Trouble After Fox Finds Out He Did A Trump Campaign Ad
September 22, 2016 - 7:00am

And of course Bill O'Reilly never said a word about it, now imagine what he would say if an anchor at MSNBC or CNN did a campaign ad for Hillary Clinton, all hell would break loose and O'Reilly would lose his mind for a week calling for them to be fired, but when Hannity does it he says nothing.

Fox News Sean Hannity, a vocal supporter of Donald Trump on his radio show and his 10 p.m. program on the top-rated, right-leaning cable network is in hot water Tuesday after his bosses were alerted to his participation in a Trump campaign video.

Hannity, who regularly features Trump on his shows in softball interviews and town halls, and recently sent a private jet for Newt Gingrich to confer with the Republican presidential nominee, appears along with Ted Nugent, Donald Trump Jr., Milwaukee County Sheriff David A. Clarke, Jr., and other Trump supporters to praise the candidate's devotion to gun rights among other virtues.

"One of the reasons I'm supporting Donald Trump this year is No. 1, he's gonna put originalists on the Supreme Court who believe in fidelity to the Constitution, separation of powers, co-equal branches of government. He's a guy who vet refugees to keep Americans safe."

Apparently, Hannity didn't see fit to obtain permission for starring in the political ad, an act that would be considered a serious breach of ethics at the overwhelming majority of news outlets (but Fox is not a news outlet, so he will be ok) and the sort of behavior that is definitely not condoned at a post-Roger Ailes Fox News.

"We were not aware of Sean Hannity participating in a promotional video," said a Fox News spokesperson, after The Daily Beast informed the network of Hannity's appearance, "and he will not be doing anything along these lines for the remainder of the election season."

It was not clear if Fox News co-presidents Bill Shine or Jack Abernethy gave Hannity a talking-to or whether he will face any disciplinary action.

Please, give me a break. They will not do anything to him, and you can bet on that.

Hot Links

O'Reilly Loses Custody Of His Kids After Choking Wife

Conclusive Proof Bill O'Reilly Is Biased In Favor Of Republicans

O'Reilly Dishonest About Publishers Weekly Not Reviewing Killing Reagan

Bill O'Reilly Proves He Is A Lying Right-Wing Idiot Once Again

O'Reilly Wrong About The Constitution & Obama's Power

4 Fox Hosts Slam O'Reilly Over His Ebola Reporting

Historians & The Patton Family Rip O'Reilly's New Patton Book

Jon Stewart Slams Fox For Criticizing President While At War

Facts On The Economy Bill O'Reily Is Totally Ignoring

Under Bush O'Reilly & Fox News Did Not Blame Him For Beheadings

Study Finds Fox News Only Tells the Truth 18% of the Time

More Republican Corruption O'Reilly Has Ignored

Jon Stewart Destroys O'Reilly & Fox For Ferguson Shooting Bias

O'Reilly Caught Lying About ISIS Threat & Juan Williams

NY Times Charles Blow Says Bill O'Reilly Is The Race Hustler

Homeland Security Shows Gutfeld & Baker Are Liars

More Republican Corruption O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Cost Of Obamacare

Bill O'Reilly Is Lying To You About Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Electic Car Company Success

The Most Annoying Celebs Who Should Go Away

Bias Alert: O'Reilly Spins Presidential Election Media Study

O'Reilly & Fox Still Ignoring GOP Voter Registration Fraud Story

Biased O'Reilly Tells Romney To Call Obama A Socialist

O'Reilly Slams Obama With Dishonest Tip Of The Day

O'Reilly & Brit Hume Spin And Lie For Mitt Romney

Fox Promotes Ridiculous Study Of Doctors & Obamacare

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media & Obama

Low Gas Prices Shut O'Reilly & The Repiblicans Up Fast

I Am Waiting For The O'Reilly Health Care Bill Apology

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About The Media

O'Reilly Ignores MRC Calling For Sharpton Firing

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Wrong On The Deficit

O'Reilly & Fox Lie That Obama To Blame For High Gas Prices

Scientist Group Slams Celebs Like Snooki & O'Reilly

More Proof O'Reilly Is Wrong About America

O'Reilly & Ingraham Lied About Planned Parenthood (Again)

Fox Unemployment Chart Shows Their Right-Wing Bias

U.S. Troops Burn A Box Of O'Reilly's Books

Kelly & O'Reilly Make Up Another Green Energy Scandal

O'Reilly Ignoring All The Stock Market Increases

O'Reilly Flat Out LIED About The Debt Obama Added

O'Reilly Caught Doctoring Florida Mans E-Mail

O'Reilly Ignored Michele Bachmann Church Scandal

O'Reilly & Morris Lied About The Debt Polls

O'Reilly Hypocrisy On The West/Schultz Story

The Truth About Those Bush Tax Cuts

Number Of Tea Party Events Down 50 Percent

NWLC Says O'Reilly Statement Made Up & Offensive

Video Proof O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Hack

O'Reilly Gets It Totally Wrong On Norway Terrorist

Norway Terrorist Info O'Reilly Ignored

O'Reilly Ignoring Ensign/Coburn Hush Money Scandal

O'Reilly Calls Obama Health Care Waivers A Scam

O'Reilly Complains About Losing In His Own Poll

O'Reilly Ignores Republican Hypocrisy On Judicial Filibusters

O'Reilly Ignoring Republican Unpopularity

O'Reilly Tells GOP How To Beat Obama With Scare Tactics

O'Reilly & Fox Are Lying To You About The Debt

O'Reilly Spins The 2008 Presidential Media Study

Important Tax Information Bill O'Reilly Has Ignored

O'Reilly Ignored McCain Op-Ed On Bin Laden

O'Reilly Scrubs Website & Podcast Of False Obama Claims

O'Reilly Ignored DOJ Black Panther Report

O'Reilly Still Ignoring Wisconsin Judge's Order Story

O'Reilly Ignored Jobs & Unemployment Report

Fox News Town Hall Protester Hypocrisy & Double Standards

O'Reilly & Varney Speculate About Oil Prices

O'Reilly Spins The Quinnipiac Temperature Poll

O'Reilly Proves How Stupid He Is Again

How O'Reilly Puts Out Right-Wing Propaganda

Fox News Insider Admits They Make Things Up

Luntz Admits Fox Has Anti-Obama Focus Groups

Reagan SG Says Health Care Bill Constitutional

O'Reilly Ignores Gore Answer To His Question

O'Reilly Wonders How The Moon Got There

More Republican Hate & Racism O'Reilly Has Ignored

Another Poll O'Reilly Has Totally Ignored

O'Reilly Thinks We Are Still In A Recession

O'Reilly's Nazi Comment Defense Was Laughable

Fox News The Least Trusted Cable News Network

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Media (Again)

O'Reilly Claims Estate Tax A Seizure Of Property

O'Reilly Called Bernie Sanders A Loon

Bloomberg Tax Cut Poll Proves O'Reilly Was Lying

O'Reilly Ignored Positive DADT Study & Story

O'Reilly & Fox Ignore Judge Being A 9-11 Truther

More Real News O'Reilly Has Ignored

More Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Ratings

O'Reilly Got The Ireland Economic Crisis Wrong

O'Reilly Ignored The Tom Delay Conviction Story

Women Of America: You Need To Read This

Conclusive Proof O'Reilly Is Dishonest & Crazy

O'Reilly Nazi Comparison Hypocrisy

O'Reilly Ignores New Poll While Promoting Paladino

Andrew Sullivan Called O'Reilly A Dishonest Propagandist

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Nevada RCP Senate Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Right-Wing Abortion Bomber Terrorism Story

Fox & O'Reilly Ignored Friday Pro-Mosque NY Rally

O'Reilly Busted For Health Insurance Premium Lies

Most Factor Gear Made in Vietnam And China

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

O'Reilly Busted For 1st Time Retraction Lie

The Bill O'Reilly Non-Apology Shirley Sherrod Apology

O'Reilly & The Right Are Racist Idiots

O'Reilly Ignored Tea Party Express Racism Story

O'Reilly Compares Gay People To Al-Qaeda

Proof O'Reilly Spins The Obama Job Rating Polls

O'Reilly Ignored Mark Kirk Military Award Lie Story

Where Are The Sedition Charges Now O'Reilly

O'Reilly Caught In A Massive Lie About Jail Time

O'Reilly Running Ads For Emergency Food Supply

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Tea Party Militia Links

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Gallup Tea Party Poll

O'Reilly Ignored Harris Poll Showing Republicans Are Stupid

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Health Reform Bill Tax

O'Reilly Caught Lying About NEJM Health Care Survey

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Again

The Truth About Ratings For News Shows

Gallup Poll Proves O'Reilly Is A Right-Wing Spin Doctor

O'Reilly Spinning Fox News Most Trusted Poll

Fox News Did Not Air Hope For Haiti Telethon

O'Reilly Caught Spinning Obama Terrorism Polls

O'Reilly Caught Lying About House Ethics Committee

O'Reilly Caught Lying About His Ratings Increase

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Limbaugh Racism

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Religious Festival

O'Reilly Caught Red Handed Lying About CNN

O'Reilly Caught Violating Journalistic Standards Again

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The ACLU & Racial Profiling

More Proof O'Reilly & FOX News Do Not Tell The Truth

O'Reilly Called Bruce Springsteen Un-American & Un-Patriotic

The Bill O'Reilly Senate Torture Report Countdown Clock

O'Reilly Caught Lying About The Obama Approval Numbers

FOX News Caught Lying About Obama Budget

O'Reilly Busted For Helping GOP Smear Pelosi

O'Reilly Caught Lying About Obama Earmark Promise Report Proves O'Reilly Wrong About Homeless Vets

O'Reilly Places 7th in 2008 Wingnut of The Year Award

O'Reilly Denys Reality About Abstinence Only Programs

Proof The O'Reilly Factor is Biased Against Barack Obama
O'Reilly said he is a non-partisan Independent, who is fair to both sides, and that he has been fair to Barack Obama. To check that claim I did a 3 month study of the Factor, it started on August 1st, 2008, and ran until October 31st, 2008. I watched the Factor every night and counted the negative and positive comments for Obama and McCain.

Visit the web page I set up, and you will see the stunning bias from O'Reilly and his mostly Republican guests against Barack Obama. Then you will see there is no doubt Bill O'Reilly is a dishonest and biased Conservative. This study is conclusive proof that O'Reilly is in the tank for John McCain.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The 3 Month Factor Bias Study:

Proof O'Reilly Lied About The Balance on His Show
O'Reilly claims the factor is balanced, and that he personally makes sure every week he has an equal number of Republican and Democrat guests. This is a bold faced lie, and I can prove it. I put together a web page that shows the guest list from the factor for the last 2 weeks. Read it and you will see with your own eyes that Bill O'Reilly is lying when he says the factor is balanced.

And remember that we are 3 weeks before a major Presidential election, or the Republican bias numbers would be worse than it is normally. O'Reilly is actually having more Democrats on than he usually does, and the balance is still not even close. If we were not so close to an election it would be a lot worse.

Visit The Web Page Below to See The Lies About The Factor Balance:

O'Reilly Sucks Investigation: Dishonesty, Deception, And Bias By Bill O'Reilly
O'Reilly claims there are no Republicans or Conservative groups that rival George Soros. O'Reilly said the top three conservative tax-exempt foundations are totally dwarfed by Soros and the radical Ford Foundation. And that they have 15 times more the assets. George Soros net worth is $8.5 billion, the Ford Foundation has a net worth of $13 billion. But the seven billionaires who donate to Newt Gingrich and other right-wing causes have a combined net worth of $34.8 billion dollars.

Somehow O'Reilly claims that Soros and the Ford Foundation have 15 times more the assets than anyone on the right. When the seven billionaires alone who give money to Newt, have roughly $14 billion more than Soros and the Ford Foundation combined.

Visit the web page below to see the massive money O'Reilly has ignored from the right:

(( Right-Wing Hate Speech Ignored by Bill O'Reilly ))
O'Reilly claims there is no hate on the right, that it's all on the left. But the way he defines hate is ridiculous, if a liberal blog or website writes an article that criticizes George W. Bush (or any Republican) O'Reilly calls it hate. When it's not hate, it's reporting the facts, there is no hate. A great example is when websites like,, etc. criticize O'Reilly he calls it hate, and says they are hate groups who lie about him.

That is a lie, it is not hate, and they are not hate websites. There is real hate on the internet, but O'Reilly does not report it, because most of it is from the right. I have documented this hate in my blog and on a web page, all of it was ignored by Bill O'Reilly, and it was never reported on the Factor.

Visit the web page below to see the massive right-wing hate O'Reilly has ignored: Privacy Policy

Copyright 2001 - 2014

eXTReMe Tracker